Comparative Study
Evaluation Studies
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Dead-space reduction and tracheal pressure measurements using a coaxial inner tube in an endotracheal tube.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects on CO(2) washout of the coaxial double lumen tube (DLT) as compared to a standard endotracheal tube (ETT) and tracheal gas insufflation (TGI). Precision of tracheal pressure monitoring through the DLT and safety issues, including intrinsic PEEP (PEEPi) formation during DLT ventilation, were also evaluated.

DESIGN: Lung model study.

SETTING: University research laboratory.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: CO(2) washout was analysed in a lung model by measuring single alveolar CO(2) concentration during DLT ventilation as compared to standard ETT ventilation, at different minute ventilation (6-14 l/min) and different CO(2)-output levels (180 ml/min, 240 ml/min, and 300 ml/min). At a CO(2) output level of 240 ml/min the CO(2) washout was also compared to tidal volume-adjusted continuous TGI and expiratory synchronised TGI. Precision of tracheal pressure monitoring and PEEPi formation during DLT ventilation was evaluated by comparing pressure in each limb above the tube to reference tracheal pressure, varying I:E ratios (1:2, 1:1, and 2:1), tidal volumes (300-700 ml), breathing frequencies (15-25), and compliance (20-50 ml/cmH(2)O). DLT ventilation had the same efficacy in removing CO(2) as continuous and expiratory synchronised TGI, reducing single alveolar CO(2) concentration by 9-21% compared to normal ventilation. Tracheal pressure could be measured through the DLT with high precision. There was only marginal formation of PEEPi at tidal volumes
CONCLUSIONS: The double lumen tube is as effective as tracheal gas insufflation in reducing CO(2) tension. Tracheal pressure and formation of PEEPi can be monitored with high precision without interrupting ventilation.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app