We have located links that may give you full text access.
CLINICAL TRIAL
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Variables affecting test-retest variability of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II stereometric parameters.
Journal of Glaucoma 2002 August
PURPOSE: To study the test-retest variability of stereometric parameters on the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II, a new clinical instrument for glaucoma management.
METHODS: In a cross-sectional study of 24 consecutive cases of glaucoma and 26 healthy subjects, Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II stereometric parameters from five consecutive images were obtained for one randomly selected eye of each subject. Test-retest variability was studied using three different statistical methods (coefficient of variance, intraclass correlation coefficient, and Cronbach alpha). The effect of age, diagnosis, linear cup/disc ratio, visual acuity, and refractive error on test-retest variability on HRT II was analyzed. The repeatability of Moorfields regression analysis and the baseline variability in the progression analysis software was also studied.
RESULTS: Using coefficient of variance, intraclass correlation coefficient, and Cronbach alpha, the test-retest variability was found to be lowest for mean cup depth, cup area, cup/disc area ratio, vertical cup/disc ratio and rim/disc area ratio, in that order. Test-retest variability had a significant correlation with age (r = 0.33, P = 0.019) and visual acuity (r = -0.46, P = 0.005). Compared with eyes with astigmatism less than 1 D (mean coefficient of variance = 6.4 +/- 4.9), the test-retest variability was higher (P = 0.044) in eyes with astigmatism more than 1D (mean coefficient of variance = 20.0 +/- 22.6). Moorfields regression analysis was inconsistent in 52% cases. The average baseline change in progression analysis software was 0.076 +/- 0.081.
CONCLUSION: The test-retest variability of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II stereometric parameters is comparable to that reported for the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. Eyes with uncorrected astigmatism more than 1 D and poor visual acuity may have a higher variability of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II stereometric parameters.
METHODS: In a cross-sectional study of 24 consecutive cases of glaucoma and 26 healthy subjects, Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II stereometric parameters from five consecutive images were obtained for one randomly selected eye of each subject. Test-retest variability was studied using three different statistical methods (coefficient of variance, intraclass correlation coefficient, and Cronbach alpha). The effect of age, diagnosis, linear cup/disc ratio, visual acuity, and refractive error on test-retest variability on HRT II was analyzed. The repeatability of Moorfields regression analysis and the baseline variability in the progression analysis software was also studied.
RESULTS: Using coefficient of variance, intraclass correlation coefficient, and Cronbach alpha, the test-retest variability was found to be lowest for mean cup depth, cup area, cup/disc area ratio, vertical cup/disc ratio and rim/disc area ratio, in that order. Test-retest variability had a significant correlation with age (r = 0.33, P = 0.019) and visual acuity (r = -0.46, P = 0.005). Compared with eyes with astigmatism less than 1 D (mean coefficient of variance = 6.4 +/- 4.9), the test-retest variability was higher (P = 0.044) in eyes with astigmatism more than 1D (mean coefficient of variance = 20.0 +/- 22.6). Moorfields regression analysis was inconsistent in 52% cases. The average baseline change in progression analysis software was 0.076 +/- 0.081.
CONCLUSION: The test-retest variability of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II stereometric parameters is comparable to that reported for the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. Eyes with uncorrected astigmatism more than 1 D and poor visual acuity may have a higher variability of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II stereometric parameters.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app