We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Otoacoustic emissions and tympanometry screening among 0-5 year olds.
Laryngoscope 2002 March
OBJECTIVES: To determine the rate of otitis media (OM)-associated transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) screening failure in a sample of preschool children, to evaluate concordance between TEOAE and tympanometry, to investigate risk factors for TEOAE failure, and to determine agreement between TEOAE failure and physician findings at referral.
STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional.
METHODS: Children from birth to 5 years underwent screening by TEOAE and tympanometry, and those with one or more abnormal test result(s) were referred to their physician for further evaluation. Univariate associations between risk factors and TEOAE failure were determined using chi-square analysis. Multiple logistic regression analysis was done to examine the relationship between specific risk factors and TEOAE failure.
RESULTS: A total of 664 children aged 2 weeks to 71 months were screened between September 1997 and May 1999. TEOAE and tympanometry failure was found in 25% and 35% of all subjects, respectively. The overall prevalence of OM-associated hearing loss was 20%. Agreement between tympanometry and TEOAE was better for the youngest (<6 mo) and oldest > or =36 mo) age groups. Of those who failed TEOAE, a physician saw 81% within 3 months, and 80% of these had a diagnosis consistent with hearing loss but only 18% had audiometric testing. Sibling history of OM was the only significant predictor for TEOAE failure.
CONCLUSIONS: TEOAE screening failure was highly consistent with physician diagnosis at follow-up. Failure of TEOAE in a screening program should be followed with diagnostic audiology testing to determine whether conductive or sensorineural hearing loss is present.
STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional.
METHODS: Children from birth to 5 years underwent screening by TEOAE and tympanometry, and those with one or more abnormal test result(s) were referred to their physician for further evaluation. Univariate associations between risk factors and TEOAE failure were determined using chi-square analysis. Multiple logistic regression analysis was done to examine the relationship between specific risk factors and TEOAE failure.
RESULTS: A total of 664 children aged 2 weeks to 71 months were screened between September 1997 and May 1999. TEOAE and tympanometry failure was found in 25% and 35% of all subjects, respectively. The overall prevalence of OM-associated hearing loss was 20%. Agreement between tympanometry and TEOAE was better for the youngest (<6 mo) and oldest > or =36 mo) age groups. Of those who failed TEOAE, a physician saw 81% within 3 months, and 80% of these had a diagnosis consistent with hearing loss but only 18% had audiometric testing. Sibling history of OM was the only significant predictor for TEOAE failure.
CONCLUSIONS: TEOAE screening failure was highly consistent with physician diagnosis at follow-up. Failure of TEOAE in a screening program should be followed with diagnostic audiology testing to determine whether conductive or sensorineural hearing loss is present.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app