We have located links that may give you full text access.
CLINICAL TRIAL
COMPARATIVE STUDY
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Gadolinium-enhanced 3-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography of pulmonary blood supply in patients with complex pulmonary stenosis or atresia: comparison with x-ray angiography.
Circulation 2002 July 24
BACKGROUND: In patients with complex pulmonary stenosis or atresia, a detailed delineation of all sources of pulmonary blood supply is necessary for planning surgical and transcatheter procedures and usually requires diagnostic cardiac catheterization. The goals of this study were to determine whether gadolinium-enhanced 3D magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) can provide a noninvasive alternative to diagnostic catheterization and to compare MRA and x-ray angiography measurements of pulmonary arteries and aortopulmonary collaterals (APCs).
METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-two patients with pulmonary stenosis or atresia (median age: 4.7 years, range: 1 day to 46.9 years) underwent both MRA and cardiac catheterization (median time: 1 month). Diagnoses included tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) with pulmonary atresia (n=13), TOF with pulmonary stenosis (n=4), post-Fontan palliation (n=5), and other complex congenital heart disease (n=10). Compared with catheterization and surgical observations, MRA had a 100% sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of main (n=10) and branch pulmonary artery (PA) stenosis or hypoplasia (n=38), as well as absent (n=5) or discontinuous (n=4) branch PAs. All 48 major APCs diagnosed by catheterization were correctly diagnosed by MRA. Three additional APCs were diagnosed by MRA but not by catheterization. The mean difference between MRA and catheterization measurements of 33 pulmonary vessel diameters was 0.5+/-1.5 mm, with a mean interobserver difference of 0.4+/-1.5 mm.
CONCLUSIONS: Gadolinium-enhanced 3D MRA is a fast and accurate technique for delineation of all sources of pulmonary blood supply in patients with complex pulmonary stenosis and atresia and can be considered a noninvasive alternative to diagnostic catheterization with x-ray angiography.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-two patients with pulmonary stenosis or atresia (median age: 4.7 years, range: 1 day to 46.9 years) underwent both MRA and cardiac catheterization (median time: 1 month). Diagnoses included tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) with pulmonary atresia (n=13), TOF with pulmonary stenosis (n=4), post-Fontan palliation (n=5), and other complex congenital heart disease (n=10). Compared with catheterization and surgical observations, MRA had a 100% sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of main (n=10) and branch pulmonary artery (PA) stenosis or hypoplasia (n=38), as well as absent (n=5) or discontinuous (n=4) branch PAs. All 48 major APCs diagnosed by catheterization were correctly diagnosed by MRA. Three additional APCs were diagnosed by MRA but not by catheterization. The mean difference between MRA and catheterization measurements of 33 pulmonary vessel diameters was 0.5+/-1.5 mm, with a mean interobserver difference of 0.4+/-1.5 mm.
CONCLUSIONS: Gadolinium-enhanced 3D MRA is a fast and accurate technique for delineation of all sources of pulmonary blood supply in patients with complex pulmonary stenosis and atresia and can be considered a noninvasive alternative to diagnostic catheterization with x-ray angiography.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
2024 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway for Treatment of Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee.Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2024 March 3
The Effect of Albumin Administration in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis.Critical Care Medicine 2024 Februrary 8
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app