EVALUATION STUDIES
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Screening for cystic fibrosis in newborn infants: results of a pilot programme based on a two tier protocol (IRT/DNA/IRT) in the Italian population.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of a two tier neonatal screening programme (IRT/DNA/IRT) for cystic fibrosis, based on immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) followed by direct cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene analysis (based on a panel of up to 31 mutations) in hypertrypsinaemic newborn infants and to compare it with a previous screening protocol.

SETTING: The study comprised all the newborn infants in the period 1 October 1998 to 31 December 1999 in the Lombardia region, north western Italy.

METHODS: The screening strategy consisted of an immunoreactive trypsinogen assay from dried blood spots, a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by an oligonucleotide ligation assay (PCR-OLA), and a sequence code separation.

RESULTS: 104 609 newborn infants were screened. 1457 hypertrypsinaemic infants (1.39%) were analysed with the PCR-OLA assay. 18 newborn homozygotes or compound heterozygotes for CFTR mutations were identified and referred to the cystic fibrosis (CF) centre at a mean age of 3 weeks. 125 infants presenting only one mutation were recalled for a sweat test: a diagnosis of CF was made in 13 infants, and parents of 112 neonates identified as carriers (1:13) received genetic counselling. The remaining 1314 hypertrypsinaemic newborn infants were recalled for IRT retesting and 177 were referred for a sweat test because the second IRT measurement was above the cut off value. Among this group a further two infants were diagnosed with CF (1.1%) leading to a CF prevalence of 1:3170.

CONCLUSIONS: This strategy resulted in an early and accurate diagnosis of CF. The IRT/DNA/IRT protocol with an OLA assay was shown to be useful in an Italian population with a genetic heterogeneity, leading to the identification of 94% of infants with CF.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app