COMMENT
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Noninvasive ventilation in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in patients with and without home noninvasive ventilation

Gilles Hilbert, Fréderic Vargas, Ruddy Valentino, Didier Gruson, Georges Gbikpi-Benissan, Jean-Pierre Cardinaud, Hervé Guenard
Critical Care Medicine 2002, 30 (7): 1453-8
12130961

OBJECTIVE: The frequency of home ventilation has increased greatly. The objective of the study was, first, to compare the outcome of episodes of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease treated with mask intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (MIPPV) in patients with home MIPPV and in patients without home ventilatory support and, second, for each category of patients, to compare patients successfully ventilated with MIPPV with those who failed with MIPPV.

DESIGN: Prospective, controlled, nonrandomized clinical study.

SETTING: Medical intensive care unit of a university hospital.

PATIENTS: In the groups with and without home MIPPV, respectively, 31 and 78 episodes of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were studied.

INTERVENTIONS: MIPPV was performed in a sequential mode and delivered through a full-face mask with a bilevel positive airway pressure system.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The clinical and functional characteristics of the two groups, at admission, were similar. In groups with and without home ventilation, respectively, success rates were 68% and 72% (p =.68), length of intensive care unit stay was 8 +/- 6 and 10 +/- 4 days (p =.02), and intensive care unit deaths were 13% and 8% (p =.30). In survivors and in groups with and without home ventilation, respectively, the total time of ventilatory assistance in intensive care unit was 5 +/- 4 and 8 +/- 4 days (p =.004), and the length of intensive care unit stay was 7 +/- 5 and 10 +/- 4 days (p =.003). A greater correction of pH, after 45 mins of MIPPV with optimal settings, was recorded in the success patients than in the failure patients, respectively; in the group with home MIPPV, the pH after 45 mins was 7.34 +/- 0.04 vs. 7.31 +/- 0.04 (p =.06), and in the group without home MIPPV, pH was 7.34 +/- 0.04 vs. 7.30 +/- 0.04 (p =.001).

CONCLUSION: MIPPV may also be favorable during episodes of acute exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Experience with MIPPV could benefit selected patients in the management of acute respiratory failure.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
12130961
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"