Clinical Trial
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Biomechanical comparison of patellar tendon repairs in a cadaver model: an evaluation of gap formation at the repair site with cyclic loading.

BACKGROUND: Ruptures of the patellar tendon are rare injuries. Surgical treatment for this injury is mandatory.

HYPOTHESIS: Gap formation does not differ between the three patellar tendon repair techniques.

STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS: Twelve fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were used to compare three techniques of patellar tendon repairs. The standard suture repair used two Krackow sutures placed in the avulsed patellar tendon, passed through transpatellar drill holes, and secured with the knee in 30 degrees of flexion. In the second group, suture repair was augmented with a No. 5 Ethibond suture. In the third group, suture repair was augmented with a 2.0 Dall-Miles cable. Testing was performed with the specimens mounted to a custom knee jig with the tibia free, simulating the knee moment of a 70-kg person. Each knee was then cycled 250 times at 0.25 Hz.

RESULTS: Gap formation across the standard suture repair averaged 7.3 mm; across the suture augmentation and cable augmentation groups it averaged 4.9 mm and 3.5 mm, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: Augmentation of patellar tendon avulsions can decrease gap formation at the repair site, allowing early mobilization.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Gap formation seen in repair without augmentation could lead to clinical failure with resultant patella alta and extensor mechanism lag.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app