We have located links that may give you full text access.
Long term results of pneumatic dilation in achalasia followed for more than 5 years.
American Journal of Gastroenterology 2002 June
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the long term therapeutic outcome in achalasia patients treated with pneumatic dilation, specifically focusing on those patients treated more than 15 yr ago.
METHODS: All patients treated in our center whose records were available for review were asked to fill out a questionnaire assessing their degree of dysphagia, retrosternal pain, regurgitation, weight loss, and coughing during the night. The number of dilations was collected from the clinical records. The results of the treatment were classified into four different classes (excellent, good, moderate, poor). For those patients who had died, the cause of death was ascertained from the medical records or from the general practitioner.
RESULTS: The questionnaires were distributed to 249 patients, 32 of whom had died. Of the 125 patients who completed the questionnaire, 81 (45 male and 36 female) were treated more than 5 yr ago. The mean follow-up was 12+/-1 yr. The therapeutic success rate was 50%, obtained after a median of four dilations (interquartile range = 3-6). Of this cohort, 25 patients (18 male and seven female, aged 35-84 yr) were treated more than 15 yr ago (mean follow-up = 20.5+/-0.5 yr). The median number of dilations was four (interquartile range = 3-7), with a therapeutic success rate of 40%. Two patients experienced a perforation, and seven were referred for surgery. Six patients out of 32 (19%) died of esophageal cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: The long term success rate of pneumatic dilation is rather low, resulting in permanent successful treatment of achalasia in only 40-50% of patients. Achalasia is a risk factor for esophageal cancer.
METHODS: All patients treated in our center whose records were available for review were asked to fill out a questionnaire assessing their degree of dysphagia, retrosternal pain, regurgitation, weight loss, and coughing during the night. The number of dilations was collected from the clinical records. The results of the treatment were classified into four different classes (excellent, good, moderate, poor). For those patients who had died, the cause of death was ascertained from the medical records or from the general practitioner.
RESULTS: The questionnaires were distributed to 249 patients, 32 of whom had died. Of the 125 patients who completed the questionnaire, 81 (45 male and 36 female) were treated more than 5 yr ago. The mean follow-up was 12+/-1 yr. The therapeutic success rate was 50%, obtained after a median of four dilations (interquartile range = 3-6). Of this cohort, 25 patients (18 male and seven female, aged 35-84 yr) were treated more than 15 yr ago (mean follow-up = 20.5+/-0.5 yr). The median number of dilations was four (interquartile range = 3-7), with a therapeutic success rate of 40%. Two patients experienced a perforation, and seven were referred for surgery. Six patients out of 32 (19%) died of esophageal cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: The long term success rate of pneumatic dilation is rather low, resulting in permanent successful treatment of achalasia in only 40-50% of patients. Achalasia is a risk factor for esophageal cancer.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Insomnia in older adults: A review of treatment options.Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine 2025 January 2
How We Treat ANCA-Associated Vasculitis: A Focus on the Maintenance Therapy.Journal of Clinical Medicine 2025 January 2
Allergic rhinitis.Allergy, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology 2024 December 27
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: 2025 Update on the Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Therapy.American Journal of Hematology 2025 January 28
Sepsis-induced cardiogenic shock: controversies and evidence gaps in diagnosis and management.Journal of Intensive Care 2025 January 2
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2025 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app