Comparative Study
Evaluation Studies
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

[Antireflux surgery in Germany. Results of a representative survey with analysis of 2,540 antireflux operations].

INTRODUCTION: Aim of this study was the evaluation of antireflux surgery in Germany.

METHODS: An anonymous questionnaire including 288 structured items about diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, complications and mortality was sent to 33% randomly selected German general surgeons (n = 546) at the end of 2000.

RESULTS: A total of 2,540 antireflux procedures was reported, 81% were performed laparoscopically; 65% were total, 31% partial fundoplications. The number of surgeons offering laparoscopic antireflux surgery increased from 0.3% in 1990 to 5% in 1995 and to 32% in 2000. Numerous modifications regarding esophageal mobilisation, crural repair, kind and extension of the wrap, use and size of a bougie, as well as an additional gastropexy were observed. Morbidity rates were significantly higher for open than for laparoscopic procedures (15.0% vs. 7.7%), mainly caused by wound healing problems (4.4% vs. 0.8%) and splenic lesions (3.1 vs. 0.6%). Gastric and esophageal perforations were similar in both groups (1.1 vs. 0.9%). Hospital mortality rate was 0.1%. We observed a frequency dependent learning curve regarding complication rates after laparoscopic antireflux surgery (< 11 fundoplication p.a.: 14.0%; 11-30 fundoplications: 7.3% (p = 0.05); > 30 fundoplications: 4.2% (p = 0.05%). Long-term-dysphagia occurred more often after 360 degrees-versus partial fundoplications (6.6% vs. 2.4%; p < 0.001) and after Nissen/Nissen-Rossetti--than after Floppy-Nissen-procedures (6.6% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.1). The recurrency rate was 9.3% without significant differences between the procedures.

CONCLUSION: Laparoscopy has replaced the open technique. Different technical approaches significantly affect the outcome after laparoscopic antireflux surgery in Germany.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app