We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Phospholipid autoantibodies and the antiphospholipid antibody syndrome: diagnostic accuracy of 23 methods studied by variation in ROC curves with number of clinical manifestations.
Clinical Chemistry 2002 July
BACKGROUND: We analyzed the diagnostic accuracies for the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) of 23 antiphospholipid antibody (APL-Ab) assays targeted at different antigen preparations and immunoglobulin isotypes.
METHODS: In 144 patients with suspected APS, anti-cardiolipin (aCL) and anti-beta2-glycoprotein I (abeta2GPI) antibodies were measured with 23 different ELISAs from three manufacturers. Data were analyzed by ROC curves. In the absence of an accepted criterion standard, the endpoint "diagnosis of APS" was varied according to the number (two through five) of signs and symptoms of APS.
RESULTS: Although the presence of lupus anticoagulant was associated significantly with APL-Ab in 10 of 23 assays (P = 0.01-10(-4)) and recurrent arterial or venous occlusions were significantly associated with APL-Ab of IgM isotype in 5 of 6 assays (P = 0.02-10(-4)), sensitivity for detection of APS did not exceed 67%. With the exception of IgA APL-Ab, the diagnostic accuracy of the assays improved when the diagnosis of APS was based on an increasing number of simultaneous features of APS. For most methods, areas under the ROC curves were >0.8 irrespective of the method's subclass specificity and antigen preparation (aCL or abeta2GPI), if the clinical diagnosis of APS was based on four or more signs and symptoms of APS.
CONCLUSION: Despite considerable heterogeneity in the individual test results, a single test of IgG or IgM isotype targeted at either aCL or abeta2GPI antibodies has excellent diagnostic accuracy when the criterion for diagnosis requires four or more typical manifestations of APS.
METHODS: In 144 patients with suspected APS, anti-cardiolipin (aCL) and anti-beta2-glycoprotein I (abeta2GPI) antibodies were measured with 23 different ELISAs from three manufacturers. Data were analyzed by ROC curves. In the absence of an accepted criterion standard, the endpoint "diagnosis of APS" was varied according to the number (two through five) of signs and symptoms of APS.
RESULTS: Although the presence of lupus anticoagulant was associated significantly with APL-Ab in 10 of 23 assays (P = 0.01-10(-4)) and recurrent arterial or venous occlusions were significantly associated with APL-Ab of IgM isotype in 5 of 6 assays (P = 0.02-10(-4)), sensitivity for detection of APS did not exceed 67%. With the exception of IgA APL-Ab, the diagnostic accuracy of the assays improved when the diagnosis of APS was based on an increasing number of simultaneous features of APS. For most methods, areas under the ROC curves were >0.8 irrespective of the method's subclass specificity and antigen preparation (aCL or abeta2GPI), if the clinical diagnosis of APS was based on four or more signs and symptoms of APS.
CONCLUSION: Despite considerable heterogeneity in the individual test results, a single test of IgG or IgM isotype targeted at either aCL or abeta2GPI antibodies has excellent diagnostic accuracy when the criterion for diagnosis requires four or more typical manifestations of APS.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app