COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Comparative in vitro activities of ertapenem against aerobic and facultative bacterial pathogens from patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections.

This study compared the in vitro activities of ertapenem (Merck & Co., Inc.), ceftriaxone, amoxicillin-clavulanate, and piperacillin-tazobactam against 518 aerobic and facultative bacterial pathogens isolated from 340 patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections. Ciprofloxacin was also tested against Gram-negative isolates. Gram-positive cocci accounted for 68.1% of the aerobic bacteria; Staphylococcus aureus was the most common isolate (45.6%). The ertapenem MIC was < or = 2 microg/ml for 80.9% of isolates and > or = 8 microg/ml for 16.2% (including isolates of enterococci, methicillin-resistant S. aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and other nonfermentative Gram-negative bacteria). Against methicillin-susceptible S. aureus, ertapenem had the most potent activity. Ertapenem was the most active drug against Enterobacteriaceae (100% susceptible), whereas amoxicillin-clavulanate was least active (66% susceptible). Piperacillin-tazobactam was the most active drug against P. aeruginosa (100% susceptible), followed by ciprofloxacin (87% susceptible). In summary, ertapenem was highly active in vitro against many aerobic and facultative bacterial pathogens commonly recovered from patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app