We have located links that may give you full text access.
Effect of endomorphin on somatostatin secretion in the isolated perfused rat stomach.
Neuropeptides 2001 October
UNLABELLED: Recently the two peptides endomorphin-1 and -2 were isolated from bovine brain, which are postulated to be endogenous agonists for mu-opiate receptors in the CNS. Since exogenous and endogenous opioids have been shown to influence gastric functions, it was of interest to examine the effects of endomorphin-1 (Tyr-Pro-Trp-Phe-NH(2), EM-1) and -2 (Tyr-Pro-Phe-Phe-NH(2), EM-2) in the isolated perfused rat stomach.
RESULTS: EM-1 10(-8) M and 10(-6) M inhibited somatostatin (SLI) levels from a mean of 79 +/- 2.7 pg/min and 73 +/- 2.7 pg/min to 52 +/- 4.0 pg/min (n = 5, n.s.) and 27 +/- 3.0 pg/min (n = 5, P < 0.05), respectively. To characterize the effect on stimulated SLI-secretion, it was prestimulated for 30 min with gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP, 10(-9) M). EM-1 decreased prestimulated SLI-secretion in a concentration-dependent manner from a mean of 469 +/- 64.9 pg/min during the immediately preceding 15 minutes to 184 +/- 12.1 pg/min (67 +/- 4.0 %) at 10(-7) M and from a mean of 1146 +/- 269.6 pg/min to 111 +/- 14.1 pg/min (94 +/- 2.2 %) at 10(-6) M (each n = 6, each P < 0.05). In addition EM-2 was also examined at a concentration of 10(-6) M, which inhibited prestimulated SLI-secretion from a mean of 514 +/- 14.9 pg/min to a nadir of 204 +/- 44.7 pg/min (42 +/- 5 %, n = 6, P < 0.05). Application of the specific mu-opiate receptor antagonist CTOP in doses of 10(-7) to 10(-5) M significantly attenuated the inhibitory effect of EM-1 10(-7) M from 67 +/- 4.0 % to 34 +/- 4.7 % (10(-7) M), 33 +/- 3.0 % (10(-6) M) or 30 +/- 8.6 % (10(-5) M), respectively. This residual inhibition, however, was still significantly different from the preceding perfusion period. On the other hand, naloxone 10(-6) M completely abolished the inhibitory effect of EM-1 10(-7) M. Similarly, the inhibitory effect of 10(-6) M EM-1 was also significantly reduced by CTOP from 94 +/- 2.2 % to 60 +/- 10.9 % (10(-7) M), 61 +/- 5.5 % (10(-6) M) or 51 +/- 12.5 % (10(-5) M), respectively, and the residual effect was significantly different from the preceding perfusion period as well. At this higher dose of EM-1 (10(-6) M) naloxone 10(-6) M reduced the effect to 35 +/- 8.2 %, but there was still a significant difference of SLI levels compared to the preceding stimulation period (P < 0.05). Naloxone 10(-6) M reduced the inhibitory effect of EM-2 10(-6) M from 42 +/- 5.0 % to 20 +/- 5.0 % (P < 0.05), which was still significantly different compared to the preceding stimulation period. EM-1 at the doses of 10(-12) M, 10(-10) M, 10(-8) M and 10(-6) M had no significant effect neither on basal gastrin, bombesin (BLI) and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) release nor during concomitant infusion of GIP.
CONCLUSIONS: EM-1 and -2 inhibit basal and prestimulated SLI secretion in the isolated perfused rat stomach, which is in part attenuated by the mu-receptor antagonist CTOP. The greater inhibitory effect of naloxone, which can be demonstrated at least during the lower dose of EM-1, indicates that other opiate receptors contribute as well. The failure of naloxone to completely antagonize the effect of the higher concentration of EM-1 or EM-2 could be due to insufficient dosage or might indicate the involvement of non-opiate receptor mechanisms.
RESULTS: EM-1 10(-8) M and 10(-6) M inhibited somatostatin (SLI) levels from a mean of 79 +/- 2.7 pg/min and 73 +/- 2.7 pg/min to 52 +/- 4.0 pg/min (n = 5, n.s.) and 27 +/- 3.0 pg/min (n = 5, P < 0.05), respectively. To characterize the effect on stimulated SLI-secretion, it was prestimulated for 30 min with gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP, 10(-9) M). EM-1 decreased prestimulated SLI-secretion in a concentration-dependent manner from a mean of 469 +/- 64.9 pg/min during the immediately preceding 15 minutes to 184 +/- 12.1 pg/min (67 +/- 4.0 %) at 10(-7) M and from a mean of 1146 +/- 269.6 pg/min to 111 +/- 14.1 pg/min (94 +/- 2.2 %) at 10(-6) M (each n = 6, each P < 0.05). In addition EM-2 was also examined at a concentration of 10(-6) M, which inhibited prestimulated SLI-secretion from a mean of 514 +/- 14.9 pg/min to a nadir of 204 +/- 44.7 pg/min (42 +/- 5 %, n = 6, P < 0.05). Application of the specific mu-opiate receptor antagonist CTOP in doses of 10(-7) to 10(-5) M significantly attenuated the inhibitory effect of EM-1 10(-7) M from 67 +/- 4.0 % to 34 +/- 4.7 % (10(-7) M), 33 +/- 3.0 % (10(-6) M) or 30 +/- 8.6 % (10(-5) M), respectively. This residual inhibition, however, was still significantly different from the preceding perfusion period. On the other hand, naloxone 10(-6) M completely abolished the inhibitory effect of EM-1 10(-7) M. Similarly, the inhibitory effect of 10(-6) M EM-1 was also significantly reduced by CTOP from 94 +/- 2.2 % to 60 +/- 10.9 % (10(-7) M), 61 +/- 5.5 % (10(-6) M) or 51 +/- 12.5 % (10(-5) M), respectively, and the residual effect was significantly different from the preceding perfusion period as well. At this higher dose of EM-1 (10(-6) M) naloxone 10(-6) M reduced the effect to 35 +/- 8.2 %, but there was still a significant difference of SLI levels compared to the preceding stimulation period (P < 0.05). Naloxone 10(-6) M reduced the inhibitory effect of EM-2 10(-6) M from 42 +/- 5.0 % to 20 +/- 5.0 % (P < 0.05), which was still significantly different compared to the preceding stimulation period. EM-1 at the doses of 10(-12) M, 10(-10) M, 10(-8) M and 10(-6) M had no significant effect neither on basal gastrin, bombesin (BLI) and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) release nor during concomitant infusion of GIP.
CONCLUSIONS: EM-1 and -2 inhibit basal and prestimulated SLI secretion in the isolated perfused rat stomach, which is in part attenuated by the mu-receptor antagonist CTOP. The greater inhibitory effect of naloxone, which can be demonstrated at least during the lower dose of EM-1, indicates that other opiate receptors contribute as well. The failure of naloxone to completely antagonize the effect of the higher concentration of EM-1 or EM-2 could be due to insufficient dosage or might indicate the involvement of non-opiate receptor mechanisms.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app