COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
MULTICENTER STUDY

Impact of small valve size on hemodynamics and left ventricular mass regression with the Toronto SPV stentless aortic bioprosthesis

David S Bach, Bernard Goldman, Edward Verrier, Michael Petracek, Jeremy Wood, Scott Goldman, Tirone David et al.
Journal of Heart Valve Disease 2002, 11 (2): 236-41
12000166

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: The hemodynamic performance of stentless aortic bioprostheses has been previously well described. Because the potential for prosthesis-patient mismatch is greatest for small valves in the aortic position, the present study sought to compare the hemodynamic performance and degree of left ventricular (LV) mass regression between valve sizes for the Toronto SPV valve, with special interest in measures of relief of LV outflow obstruction afforded by the smallest valves.

METHODS: This study included 257 patients (178 men, 79 women; mean age 63.5+/-11.4 years; range: 34-93 years) from six investigative centers with complete echocardiography/Doppler data obtained through three years. Valve sizes implanted were 21 mm (n = 11), 23 mm (n = 23), 25 mm (n = 58), 27 mm (n = 83), and 29 mm (n = 82). Echocardiography was performed at discharge, six months, one year, and yearly thereafter, and interpreted in a centralized core laboratory. Mean gradient, effective orifice area (EOA), indexed EOA, and absolute and percent change in LV mass index were used as markers of hemodynamic performance.

RESULTS: For all valve sizes, mean and peak gradients fell and EOA increased early after surgery. There were no differences between groups in the degree to which gradients fell, and EOA increased from discharge to one year follow up. At one year, indexed EOA was 0.9 cm2/m2 for valve sizes 21 and 23 mm, and 1.0-1.2 cm2/m2 for sizes 25, 27 and 29 mm. There was statistically significant LV mass regression for all valve sizes (p <0.05), and no differences between valve sizes in the magnitude of absolute or percent change in LV mass index between baseline and three years.

CONCLUSION: The Toronto SPV valve demonstrates excellent parameters of hemodynamic performance for all valve sizes, including the smallest valves used in only a minority of patients. Findings of indexed EOA > or = 0.9 cm2/m2, and equivalent degrees of LV mass regression for all valve sizes, reinforces the excellent hemodynamic performance of stentless aortic bioprostheses, and suggests that prosthesis-patient mismatch should be minimized with these valves.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Trending Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
12000166
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"