We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Health professions students' perceptions of interprofessional relationships.
Academic Medicine 2002 April
PURPOSE: To make a preliminary assessment of the perceptions of health professions students about interprofessional cooperation.
METHOD: Health professions students (588 students from eight professions) at the Iowa Geriatric Education Center's partner institutions received a questionnaire of demographics questions and the Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale (IEPS). The IEPS is an 18-item questionnaire that uses a six-point Likert-type scale to measure attitudes toward interprofessional cooperation on four factors: competence and autonomy, perceived need for cooperation, perception of actual cooperation, and understanding others' value.
RESULTS: Total mean IEPS scores differed significantly among professional groups (p =.001), with physician assistant students scoring highest (most positive attitudes) and chiropractic students scoring lowest. The medical students' mean total score was significantly lower than was that of physician assistant students (p =.003) and higher than was that of chiropractic students (p =.000), but medical students' scores did not differ significantly at the alpha =.05 level from those of osteopathy, physical therapy, nursing, podiatry, or social work students.
CONCLUSION: This study provides the first normative data for the IEPS for students from these eight health professions. This instrument may be valuable when designing an evaluation scheme for training programs that have interdisciplinary components, which may be increasingly prevalent in the future.
METHOD: Health professions students (588 students from eight professions) at the Iowa Geriatric Education Center's partner institutions received a questionnaire of demographics questions and the Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale (IEPS). The IEPS is an 18-item questionnaire that uses a six-point Likert-type scale to measure attitudes toward interprofessional cooperation on four factors: competence and autonomy, perceived need for cooperation, perception of actual cooperation, and understanding others' value.
RESULTS: Total mean IEPS scores differed significantly among professional groups (p =.001), with physician assistant students scoring highest (most positive attitudes) and chiropractic students scoring lowest. The medical students' mean total score was significantly lower than was that of physician assistant students (p =.003) and higher than was that of chiropractic students (p =.000), but medical students' scores did not differ significantly at the alpha =.05 level from those of osteopathy, physical therapy, nursing, podiatry, or social work students.
CONCLUSION: This study provides the first normative data for the IEPS for students from these eight health professions. This instrument may be valuable when designing an evaluation scheme for training programs that have interdisciplinary components, which may be increasingly prevalent in the future.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app