COMPARATIVE STUDY
EVALUATION STUDIES
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Thirteen years follow-up after radical transsternal thymectomy for myasthenia gravis. Do short-term results predict long-term outcome?

OBJECTIVE: Long-term evaluation of efficacy and quality of life after radical surgical approach for myasthenia gravis (MG). Comparison between short-term follow-up and long-term outcome.

METHODS: All patients (n=26, 16 men and 10 women, mean age: 40.7 years) underwent total transsternal thymectomy for MG between 1986 and 1989. Prospective analysis of the patients for short-term follow-up (mean 22.4 months) was published in 1991. The same group of patients was reevaluated in 2001 (range of follow-up 11.4-15.2 years) and assessed according to the classification of Osserman and Oosterhuis.

RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 13.0 years (range 11.4-15.2 years). Two patients were lost from follow-up and one died 4 years after thymectomy for reasons unrelated to MG (n=23). No early or late postoperative mortality was observed. One sternal osteomyelitis occurred. Late postoperative morbidity included sternal instabilities (n=2), mild residual thoracic pain (n=6), and hypertrophic scars (n=7). Five patients were rehospitalized for aggravating MG and needed plasmapheresis (n=3) and intubation (n=1). Thirteen patients (56.5%) showed objective clinical improvement, including six patients (26.1%) with complete remission. Eleven patients (47.8%) do not take any medication at all. Because some late relapse may occur several years after operation, the rate of improvement decreased slightly, whereas the difference between short and long-term follow-up was not statistically significant (P=0.405). Twenty patients (87%) returned to work, including part-time occupation (n=4). Fourteen patients (61%) are performing sports regularly.

CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm that radical, transsternal thymectomy is an effective and safe therapeutic modality for MG. Short-term results seem to deteriorate over time, therefore long-term studies for minimally invasive approaches have to prove equal results before replacing the standard procedure.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app