ENGLISH ABSTRACT
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

[Effect of inoculum size on sensitivity and specificity of the double-disk synergy test for the detection of wide-spectrum beta-lactamases].

The plasmid-mediated extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL) confer resistance to oxymino-cephalosporins, such as cefotaxime, ceftazidime, and ceftriaxone and to monobactams such as aztreonam. It is well known fact that ESBL producing bacteria exhibit a pronounced inoculum effect against broad spectrum cephalosporins like ceftazidime, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone and cefoperazone. The aim of this investigation was to determine the effect of inoculum size on the sensitivity and specificity of double-disk synergy test (DDST) which is the test most frequently used for detection of ESBLs, in comparison with other two methods (determination of ceftazidime MIC with and without clavulanate and inhibitor potentiated disk-diffusion test) which are seldom used in clinical laboratories. The experiments were performed on a set of K. pneumoniae strains with previously characterized beta-lactamases which comprise: 10 SHV-5 beta-lactamase producing K. pneumoniae, 20 SHV-2 + 1 SHV 2a beta-lactamase producing K. pneumoniae, 7 SHV-12 beta-lactamase producing K. pneumoniae, 39 putative SHV ESBL producing K. pneumoniae and 26 K. pneumoniae isolates highly susceptible to ceftazidime according to Kirby-Bauer disk-diffusion method and thus considered to be ESBL negative. According to the results of this investigation, increase in inoculum size affected more significantly the sensitivity of DDST than of other two methods. The sensitivity of the DDST was lower when a higher inoculum size of 10(8) CFU/ml was applied, in distinction from other two methods (MIC determination and inhibitor potentiated disk-diffusion test) which retained high sensitivity regardless of the density of bacterial suspension. On the other hand, DDST displayed higher specificity compared to other two methods regardless of the inoculum size. This investigation found that DDST is a reliable method but it is important to standardize the inoculum size.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app