ENGLISH ABSTRACT
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

[Preliminary results of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation: improved size matching and better outcomes with right lobe versus left lobe grafts].

Harefuah 2002 Februrary
UNLABELLED: Grafts from living donors are a novel alternative to cadaveric organs for adult liver recipients.

METHODS: Twenty adults (mean age, 46 +/- 15 years; mean weight, 68 +/- 12 kg) received left lobes (n = 10; mean weight, 481 +/- 73 g) or right lobes (n = 10; mean weight, 805 +/- 115 g) from living donors (mean age, 38 +/- 10 years; mean weight, 85 +/- 9 kg). Hepatectomy was done using ultrasonic scissors, without vascular isolation. Transplantation was performed in a piggy-back fashion. Biliary reconstruction was performed with a single hepatico-enterostomy to the left duct for LL grafts and with 2 (n = 8) or 3 (n = 2) hepatico-enterostomies in RL grafts.

RESULTS: All donors recovered without significant complications or heterologous transfusion. Three recipients (15%) died. Graft survival is 70% (mean follow-up, 8 months). Mean graft: recipient weight ratios (GRWR) were 0.75% +/- 0.21% (range, 0.51-1.06) in LL recipients, and 1.10% +/- 0.15% (range, 0.93-1.44) in RL recipients. Four recipients of relatively small LL grafts (GRWR < 0.8%), all with Child's B or C cirrhosis, developed small-for-size syndrome. One died; 2 required retransplantation. Small LL grafts were used successfully in Child's A patients or non-cirrhotics (the indication for transplantation was tumor). The LL group had 5 bile leaks (50%) and 3 major vascular complications (30%). One was fatal; 1 mandated retransplantation. The RL group had 2 biliary leaks (20%) and 1 hepatic artery thrombosis, which necessitated retransplantation.

CONCLUSIONS: Right lobe grafts prevented small-for-size syndrome. Although donor hepatectomy and recipient grafting are technically more demanding, right lobe grafting seems to involve fewer recipient complications and better outcome.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app