We have located links that may give you full text access.
Biologic and mechanical stability of single-tooth implants: 4- to 7-year follow-up.
BACKGROUND: Single-tooth implants have been reported to achieve a high level of surgical and prosthetic success. However, close inspection of the literature reveals a paucity of data on the follow-up of single-tooth implants in function for 5 years or more. Since unsplinted implants may be considered to be subject to greater functional stresses, there is a need to report on the long-term biologic and mechanical integrity of such implant-supported restorations.
PURPOSE: To report on the long-term follow-up of single-tooth implants, restored and in function for 4 to 7 years.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven Astra Tech single-tooth implants were subject to a clinical audit to evaluate implant and prosthetic success as well as response of both hard and soft tissues over a 1- to 4-year follow-up. This current report presents data on the biologic and mechanical integrity of 23 of these single-tooth implants, which have been in function for up to 7 years (mean, 63 mo). Data are provided with respect to implant survival, maintenance of marginal bone levels, soft-tissue health, and the recording of any adverse events, including prosthetic complications.
RESULTS: Only 14 implants in 13 patients were available for review, with no failures for this group of implants. One patient from the original group, who was lost to follow-up, was known to have suffered an implant failure. Furthermore, in accordance with established criteria, the remaining 13 implants that are not included in this report must at this time also be considered as potential failures. As such, the best-case scenario would be a 95.6% success rate for the 23 implants included in this review and the worst-case scenario would be a 60.8% success rate. Mean marginal bone loss measured 0.49 mm mesially and 0.76 mm distally, with a frequency of bone loss of 50%. Soft tissues were clinically healthy. There were few adverse events, with only one case of abutment screw loosening, detected at the 6-year review. In addition, crown decementation was recorded three times in two patients.
CONCLUSIONS: It can be concluded that the Astra Tech single-tooth implant can achieve long-term biologic and mechanical stability when used to restore single missing teeth, over the long-term.
PURPOSE: To report on the long-term follow-up of single-tooth implants, restored and in function for 4 to 7 years.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven Astra Tech single-tooth implants were subject to a clinical audit to evaluate implant and prosthetic success as well as response of both hard and soft tissues over a 1- to 4-year follow-up. This current report presents data on the biologic and mechanical integrity of 23 of these single-tooth implants, which have been in function for up to 7 years (mean, 63 mo). Data are provided with respect to implant survival, maintenance of marginal bone levels, soft-tissue health, and the recording of any adverse events, including prosthetic complications.
RESULTS: Only 14 implants in 13 patients were available for review, with no failures for this group of implants. One patient from the original group, who was lost to follow-up, was known to have suffered an implant failure. Furthermore, in accordance with established criteria, the remaining 13 implants that are not included in this report must at this time also be considered as potential failures. As such, the best-case scenario would be a 95.6% success rate for the 23 implants included in this review and the worst-case scenario would be a 60.8% success rate. Mean marginal bone loss measured 0.49 mm mesially and 0.76 mm distally, with a frequency of bone loss of 50%. Soft tissues were clinically healthy. There were few adverse events, with only one case of abutment screw loosening, detected at the 6-year review. In addition, crown decementation was recorded three times in two patients.
CONCLUSIONS: It can be concluded that the Astra Tech single-tooth implant can achieve long-term biologic and mechanical stability when used to restore single missing teeth, over the long-term.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app