We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
PON1 L55M polymorphism is not a predictor of coronary atherosclerosis either alone or in combination with Q192R polymorphism in an Italian population.
European Journal of Clinical Investigation 2002 January
BACKGROUND: The present study evaluated the role of the PON1 L55M polymorphism independently and in conjunction with the Q192R polymorphism on the risk of coronary atherosclerosis in an Italian population.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred and ninety-one subjects with significant coronary stenosis (> 50%) (coronary artery disease-positive; CAD+), 196 subjects with normal coronary arteries (< 10% stenosis) (CAD-) and 178 healthy controls were screened using a combination of polymerase chain reaction and restriction enzyme digestion.
RESULTS: In the pooled population, the frequencies of L and M alleles were 0.63 and 0.37, respectively; the most common haplotypes were QQ/LM (24.2%) and QR/LL (21.8%) and a strong linkage disequilibrium between L/55 and R/192 alleles was observed (D' = -0.91; P < 0.0001). CAD+ subjects did not show any significant differences in the distribution of PON1-55 genotypes as compared to CAD- subjects and population controls (chi2 = 1.5, P = 0.8). After controlling for other risk factors, the low-concentration M allele was not associated with a significant change of CAD risk (OR 1.02; 95% CI 0.80-1.29; P = 0.87). Moreover, the L55M polymorphism did not show any interaction with other risk factors such as smoking, diabetes, hypertension, low levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) or high ratios of low-density to high-density lipoproteins. The combination of L55M with the Q192R polymorphism did not show any effect on CAD risk. However, a marginal decrease in myocardial infarction risk was detected when QQ/MM carriers (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.26-0.99; P = 0.048), but not LL/RR carriers, were compared with subjects not homozygous for an L or R allele.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings did not indicate a major effect of the PON1 L55M polymorphism, either alone or in combination with the Q192R polymorphism, on CAD risk. Additional studies are needed for a better evaluation of the role of the 55/192 PON1 genotypes in combination on myocardial infarction risk.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred and ninety-one subjects with significant coronary stenosis (> 50%) (coronary artery disease-positive; CAD+), 196 subjects with normal coronary arteries (< 10% stenosis) (CAD-) and 178 healthy controls were screened using a combination of polymerase chain reaction and restriction enzyme digestion.
RESULTS: In the pooled population, the frequencies of L and M alleles were 0.63 and 0.37, respectively; the most common haplotypes were QQ/LM (24.2%) and QR/LL (21.8%) and a strong linkage disequilibrium between L/55 and R/192 alleles was observed (D' = -0.91; P < 0.0001). CAD+ subjects did not show any significant differences in the distribution of PON1-55 genotypes as compared to CAD- subjects and population controls (chi2 = 1.5, P = 0.8). After controlling for other risk factors, the low-concentration M allele was not associated with a significant change of CAD risk (OR 1.02; 95% CI 0.80-1.29; P = 0.87). Moreover, the L55M polymorphism did not show any interaction with other risk factors such as smoking, diabetes, hypertension, low levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) or high ratios of low-density to high-density lipoproteins. The combination of L55M with the Q192R polymorphism did not show any effect on CAD risk. However, a marginal decrease in myocardial infarction risk was detected when QQ/MM carriers (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.26-0.99; P = 0.048), but not LL/RR carriers, were compared with subjects not homozygous for an L or R allele.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings did not indicate a major effect of the PON1 L55M polymorphism, either alone or in combination with the Q192R polymorphism, on CAD risk. Additional studies are needed for a better evaluation of the role of the 55/192 PON1 genotypes in combination on myocardial infarction risk.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app