We have located links that may give you full text access.
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Sutureless securement device reduces complications of peripherally inserted central venous catheters.
PURPOSE: This study was conducted to evaluate the performance of a sutureless adhesive-backed device, StatLock, for securement of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs). Earlier studies have demonstrated that StatLock significantly reduces catheter-related complications when compared to tape. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a sutureless securement device offers an advantage over suture in preventing catheter-related complications.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 170 patients requiring PICCs, which were randomized to suture (n = 85) or StatLock (n = 85) securement were prospectively studied. Patients were followed throughout their entire catheter course, and PICC-related complications including dislodgment, infection, occlusion, leakage, and central venous thrombosis were documented. Catheter outcome data were compared to determine if statistically significant differences existed between the suture and StatLock groups.
RESULTS: The groups had equivalent demographic characteristics and catheter indications. Average securement time with StatLock was significantly shorter (4.7 minutes vs 2.7 minutes;P <.001). Although StatLock was associated with fewer total complications (42 vs 61), this difference did not achieve significance. However, there were significantly fewer PICC-related bloodstream infections in the StatLock group (2 vs 10; P =.032). One securement-related needle-stick injury was documented during suturing of a PICC.
CONCLUSION: The sutureless anchor pad was beneficial for both patients and health care providers. Further investigation to determine how StatLock helps reduce catheter-related blood stream infections is necessary.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 170 patients requiring PICCs, which were randomized to suture (n = 85) or StatLock (n = 85) securement were prospectively studied. Patients were followed throughout their entire catheter course, and PICC-related complications including dislodgment, infection, occlusion, leakage, and central venous thrombosis were documented. Catheter outcome data were compared to determine if statistically significant differences existed between the suture and StatLock groups.
RESULTS: The groups had equivalent demographic characteristics and catheter indications. Average securement time with StatLock was significantly shorter (4.7 minutes vs 2.7 minutes;P <.001). Although StatLock was associated with fewer total complications (42 vs 61), this difference did not achieve significance. However, there were significantly fewer PICC-related bloodstream infections in the StatLock group (2 vs 10; P =.032). One securement-related needle-stick injury was documented during suturing of a PICC.
CONCLUSION: The sutureless anchor pad was beneficial for both patients and health care providers. Further investigation to determine how StatLock helps reduce catheter-related blood stream infections is necessary.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app