We have located links that may give you full text access.
Outcome of cardiac arrests in a Portuguese hospital--evaluation of a hospital cardiopulmonar resuscitation program at one year.
Portuguese Journal of Cardiology : An Official Journal of the Portuguese Society of Cardiology 2001 October
OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of a hospital-wide resuscitation program at one year.
METHODS: All records of cardiac arrest calls were collected, logged in a database by the same operator, and analyzed. The cardiac arrest teams consist of a physician and a nurse with ALS (Advanced Life Support) training. Each team has a radio that is activated by a single emergency number. Only cardiac arrest calls were analyzed.
RESULTS: Between March 1999 and March 2000 there were 173 emergency team calls. Of these, 120 were cardiac arrest calls (90 in-hospital and 30 from the emergency room--out-of-hospital cardiac arrests). Of the 90 in-hospital cardiac arrests, 61% were male, and median age was 73 years. In 90% of the calls, basic life support (BLS) was started before the arrival of the cardiac arrest team. The immediate cause was cardiac in 39% of the patients. Initial rhythm was ventricular fibrillation in 8%, asystole in 60% and other rhythms in 24% of the patients. Thirty percent presented return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). There were no differences between those in whom BLS was started before the arrival of the cardiac arrest team and those in whom BLS had not been started. Ten patients (11%) were discharged from hospital. Of the 30 out-of-hospital cardiac arrests, 70% were male, and median age was 69 years. In 97% BLS was started before the arrival of the cardiac arrest team. The immediate cause was cardiac in 30% of patients. Initial rhythm was ventricular fibrillation in 10%, asystole in 73% and other rhythms in 17% of the patients. ROSC was achieved in 27% of the patients. Three patients (10%) were discharged from hospital. There were no differences either in ROSC or in survival to hospital discharge between in-hospital and out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. The state of health previous to cardiac arrest was significantly different between in- and out-of-hospital cardiac arrests: 3% versus 32% healthy, with no functional limitation. The authors conclude that: first, the current records do not enable all the desired goals of the "Utstein style" to be achieved and need to be reviewed; second, 90 to 97% of BLS previous to the arrival of the cardiac arrest team is a good indication of the efficiency of the hospital-wide program, which included training in BLS for all the hospital staff; third, the survival rate, although in accordance with much of the literature, could be improved.
METHODS: All records of cardiac arrest calls were collected, logged in a database by the same operator, and analyzed. The cardiac arrest teams consist of a physician and a nurse with ALS (Advanced Life Support) training. Each team has a radio that is activated by a single emergency number. Only cardiac arrest calls were analyzed.
RESULTS: Between March 1999 and March 2000 there were 173 emergency team calls. Of these, 120 were cardiac arrest calls (90 in-hospital and 30 from the emergency room--out-of-hospital cardiac arrests). Of the 90 in-hospital cardiac arrests, 61% were male, and median age was 73 years. In 90% of the calls, basic life support (BLS) was started before the arrival of the cardiac arrest team. The immediate cause was cardiac in 39% of the patients. Initial rhythm was ventricular fibrillation in 8%, asystole in 60% and other rhythms in 24% of the patients. Thirty percent presented return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). There were no differences between those in whom BLS was started before the arrival of the cardiac arrest team and those in whom BLS had not been started. Ten patients (11%) were discharged from hospital. Of the 30 out-of-hospital cardiac arrests, 70% were male, and median age was 69 years. In 97% BLS was started before the arrival of the cardiac arrest team. The immediate cause was cardiac in 30% of patients. Initial rhythm was ventricular fibrillation in 10%, asystole in 73% and other rhythms in 17% of the patients. ROSC was achieved in 27% of the patients. Three patients (10%) were discharged from hospital. There were no differences either in ROSC or in survival to hospital discharge between in-hospital and out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. The state of health previous to cardiac arrest was significantly different between in- and out-of-hospital cardiac arrests: 3% versus 32% healthy, with no functional limitation. The authors conclude that: first, the current records do not enable all the desired goals of the "Utstein style" to be achieved and need to be reviewed; second, 90 to 97% of BLS previous to the arrival of the cardiac arrest team is a good indication of the efficiency of the hospital-wide program, which included training in BLS for all the hospital staff; third, the survival rate, although in accordance with much of the literature, could be improved.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app