We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Experimental examination for optimized stabilisation of trochanteric femur fractures, intra- or extramedullary implant localisation and influence of femur neck component profile on cut-out risk].
INTRODUCTION: Fractures of the proximal femur are typical injuries of the elderly. Therefore immediate restoration of weight-bearing capacity and prevention of local complications with the need for of secondary surgical procedures are very important.
METHODS: In an experimental test the weight-bearing capacity under alternating load up to 2,000 N and 4,000 cycles was analysed in the newest implants for extramedullary fixation (the DHS with lateral buttress plate, DHS) and for intramedullary fixation (the gliding nail, GN). If no instability occurred a static maximum load test was performed. To avoid the influence of other variables the tests were performed with sowbone femora with A2, A31, (AO classification) subtrochanteric reversed and subtrochanteric transverse osteotomies. To analyse the influence of long term alternating load and of the biological bone, a pair of cadaver femora were tested with 100,000 cycles of 2,000 N alternating load after GN and DHS osteosynthesis. In a second examination the influence of the profile of the femur neck component on the migration and cut-out risk was tested. Nine head and neck parts of sowbone femora with a A2 osteotomy 1,000 alternating load tests at 1,000 and 1,500 N were performed after GN I beam plate, gamma nail and PFN screw fixation. Additionally, three pairs of cadaver femora were tested with 6,000 cycles from 1,000-3,500 N of alternating load comparing GN vs gamma, GN vs PFN and gamma vs PFN to avoid influence of the biological variability on the ranking.
RESULTS: The weight-bearing capacity of the GN (4,230-5,557 N) was about 100% higher than that of the DHS (2,465-3,049 N). The total deformation was 1/3 higher for the DHS (17.3 +/- 2.06 mm) than for the GN (10.73 +/- 4,33 mm). After 100,000 alternating load cycles no instability and a total deformation of 13.3 mm was found for the GN, but for the DHS instability occurred after 15,800 cycles. The migration of the I-beam GN plate at 1,000 N in sowbone femora was 0.7 mm for the gamma screw 1.69 mm and for the PFN 2 mm but one cut-out was observed. At 1,500 N the difference are even higher, all three PFN showed a cut-out and in two of the three gamma screws rotation of the head and neck around the screw was observed. In the cadaver tests similar differences were found with a migration at least double that of the GN I beam plate for the gamma screw and the PFN double-screw fixation. There was no difference between the gamma and PFN fixation in the cadaver pair test.
METHODS: In an experimental test the weight-bearing capacity under alternating load up to 2,000 N and 4,000 cycles was analysed in the newest implants for extramedullary fixation (the DHS with lateral buttress plate, DHS) and for intramedullary fixation (the gliding nail, GN). If no instability occurred a static maximum load test was performed. To avoid the influence of other variables the tests were performed with sowbone femora with A2, A31, (AO classification) subtrochanteric reversed and subtrochanteric transverse osteotomies. To analyse the influence of long term alternating load and of the biological bone, a pair of cadaver femora were tested with 100,000 cycles of 2,000 N alternating load after GN and DHS osteosynthesis. In a second examination the influence of the profile of the femur neck component on the migration and cut-out risk was tested. Nine head and neck parts of sowbone femora with a A2 osteotomy 1,000 alternating load tests at 1,000 and 1,500 N were performed after GN I beam plate, gamma nail and PFN screw fixation. Additionally, three pairs of cadaver femora were tested with 6,000 cycles from 1,000-3,500 N of alternating load comparing GN vs gamma, GN vs PFN and gamma vs PFN to avoid influence of the biological variability on the ranking.
RESULTS: The weight-bearing capacity of the GN (4,230-5,557 N) was about 100% higher than that of the DHS (2,465-3,049 N). The total deformation was 1/3 higher for the DHS (17.3 +/- 2.06 mm) than for the GN (10.73 +/- 4,33 mm). After 100,000 alternating load cycles no instability and a total deformation of 13.3 mm was found for the GN, but for the DHS instability occurred after 15,800 cycles. The migration of the I-beam GN plate at 1,000 N in sowbone femora was 0.7 mm for the gamma screw 1.69 mm and for the PFN 2 mm but one cut-out was observed. At 1,500 N the difference are even higher, all three PFN showed a cut-out and in two of the three gamma screws rotation of the head and neck around the screw was observed. In the cadaver tests similar differences were found with a migration at least double that of the GN I beam plate for the gamma screw and the PFN double-screw fixation. There was no difference between the gamma and PFN fixation in the cadaver pair test.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app