COMPARATIVE STUDY
EVALUATION STUDIES
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Pre-operative intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in stable patients with left main coronary disease.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether prophylactic, pre-operative, intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABC) improves clinical outcome in stable patients with severe left main coronary artery disease.

METHODS: A post-hoc analysis of 457 prospectively tracked, non-randomized patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) for left main stenoses 50% and multivessel coronary disease, but without any hemodynamic compromise or ongoing angina, was conducted. Patients with heart failure, shock, ongoing ischemia or previous CABG were excluded. In 287 patients, pre-operative IABC was not used (Group 1), while IABC was initiated in 170 patients for "prophylaxis" (Group 2).

RESULTS: Groups 1 and 2 were similar in age (67 +/- 10 years versus 67 +/- 11 years, respectively), sex (72% male versus 71% male, respectively), and body mass index (28 +/- 5.5 versus 27 +/- 5.1, respectively). However, more Group 1 patients had peripheral vascular disease (PVD) (25% versus 11%), but more Group 2 patients had diabetes (37% versus 29%), and a lower left ventricular ejection fraction. The unadjusted 30-day mortality was significantly higher in Group 1 [16 (5.6%) versus 2 (1.2%); p = 0.02]. Cardiopulmonary bypass time and post-operative length of stay did not differ between the two groups. After adjusting for PVD in the multivariate analysis, the p-value for the no IABP versus IABP comparison in the presence of PVD was 0.10, even though 0/18 patients with PVD and IABC died.

CONCLUSION: While unadjusted mortality appears lower with prophylactic IABC, confounding variables such as PVD mandate a larger, randomized clinical trial in order to establish the role of IABC in stable patients with left main disease.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app