We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
REVIEW
Differentiating clinical profiles: predicting good responders, poor responders, and hyperresponders.
Fertility and Sterility 2001 December
OBJECTIVE: To describe the different clinical and laboratory diagnostic methods (basal and dynamic tests) available to identify poor-, good-, and high-responder patients undergoing treatment with in vitro fertilization (IVF).
DESIGN: Analytical review.
SETTING: IVF program.
PATIENTS: Women in different age groups undergoing IVF treatment.
INTERVENTION(S): Assessment of clinical and laboratory parameters and correlation with outcomes.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Response to ovarian stimulation and success of the assisted reproductive technologies (ART).
RESULT(S): Age, basal follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), estradiol and inhibin-B levels, and dynamic testing serve to predict individual response to ovarian stimulation for ART.
CONCLUSION(S): Markers of ovarian reserve (day 3 FSH, inhibin B and E(2)) are particularly predictive and useful in guiding the choice of the optimal protocol for ART. However, no tests are absolutely predictive of a successful outcome. For the younger individual, and for the patient at risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), assessment and identification of clinical and laboratory parameters predictive of a high response to ovarian stimulation should guide the clinician in choosing an appropriate stimulation protocol, thus attenuating the risk of OHSS.
DESIGN: Analytical review.
SETTING: IVF program.
PATIENTS: Women in different age groups undergoing IVF treatment.
INTERVENTION(S): Assessment of clinical and laboratory parameters and correlation with outcomes.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Response to ovarian stimulation and success of the assisted reproductive technologies (ART).
RESULT(S): Age, basal follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), estradiol and inhibin-B levels, and dynamic testing serve to predict individual response to ovarian stimulation for ART.
CONCLUSION(S): Markers of ovarian reserve (day 3 FSH, inhibin B and E(2)) are particularly predictive and useful in guiding the choice of the optimal protocol for ART. However, no tests are absolutely predictive of a successful outcome. For the younger individual, and for the patient at risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), assessment and identification of clinical and laboratory parameters predictive of a high response to ovarian stimulation should guide the clinician in choosing an appropriate stimulation protocol, thus attenuating the risk of OHSS.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app