We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Radiologic diagnosis of adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder: comparative study among MRI, helical CT, and transabdominal US.
Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 2001 November
PURPOSE: The goal of this work was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of transabdominal ultrasound (US), helical CT, and MRI in the diagnosis of adenomyomatosis (ADM) of the gallbladder.
METHOD: Twenty patients with surgically proven ADM were included, all of whom underwent preoperative US, helical CT with 3 mm collimation, and MRI with half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement (RARE). All images were retrospectively reviewed by two radiologists, and the presence of ADM was assessed at three compartments (neck, body, and fundus) of the organ. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed, and sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated for each modality.
RESULTS: The A z values (area under the curve) for MRI, helical CT, and US were 0.98, 0.85, and 0.72 for the Reader 1, respectively, showing no statistically significant interobserver difference in any of the three modalities. MRI showed a significantly higher A z value than helical CT or US (p < 0.1). The accuracies of MRI, helical CT, and US were 93, 75, and 66%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Among the three modalities tested, MRI with half-Fourier RARE sequence was the most accurate for diagnosing ADM.
METHOD: Twenty patients with surgically proven ADM were included, all of whom underwent preoperative US, helical CT with 3 mm collimation, and MRI with half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement (RARE). All images were retrospectively reviewed by two radiologists, and the presence of ADM was assessed at three compartments (neck, body, and fundus) of the organ. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed, and sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated for each modality.
RESULTS: The A z values (area under the curve) for MRI, helical CT, and US were 0.98, 0.85, and 0.72 for the Reader 1, respectively, showing no statistically significant interobserver difference in any of the three modalities. MRI showed a significantly higher A z value than helical CT or US (p < 0.1). The accuracies of MRI, helical CT, and US were 93, 75, and 66%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Among the three modalities tested, MRI with half-Fourier RARE sequence was the most accurate for diagnosing ADM.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app