JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, NON-P.H.S.
RESEARCH SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, P.H.S.
Labor epidural analgesia and intrapartum maternal hyperthermia.
Obstetrics and Gynecology 2001 November
OBJECTIVE: To determine if women receiving continuous epidural analgesia are more likely to develop intrapartum fever and related neonatal effects.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of nulliparous women with term gestations in spontaneous labor delivered during a 12-month period immediately before the availability of on-demand labor epidural analgesia (Before group) and a similar group of nulliparas delivered after labor epidural analgesia was available on request (After group).
RESULTS: The frequency of epidural increased from 1% before the availability of on-request epidural analgesia to 83% after epidural analgesia was available on request. A maximal temperature of at least 100.4F was detected in three of 498 (0.6%) women in the Before group, and in 63 of 572 women (11.0%) in the After group (relative risk [RR] = 18.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.8, 57.8, P <.01). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that on-request labor epidural analgesia was associated with an intrapartum temperature of at least 99.5F (RR = 3.0, 95% CI 2.3, 3.6, P <.001) and intrapartum temperature of at least 100.4F (RR = 20.2, 95% CI 7.0, 86.0, P <.001). There were statistically significant increases in the proportion of newborns who had complete blood counts (24% versus 13.5%, RR = 1.5, 95% CI 1.3, 1.8, P <.01) and blood cultures (30.7% versus 8.6%, RR = 1.7, 95% CI 1.2, 2.4, P <.05) in the After period compared with the Before group; however, there was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of infants who received antibiotic therapy for presumed sepsis between the After and Before periods (5.8% versus 4.6%, RR = 1.15, 95% CI 0.8, 1.6, P =.38). No infants in either group had culture-proven sepsis.
CONCLUSION: The use of labor epidural analgesia is associated with a clinically significant increase in the incidence of intrapartum fever.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of nulliparous women with term gestations in spontaneous labor delivered during a 12-month period immediately before the availability of on-demand labor epidural analgesia (Before group) and a similar group of nulliparas delivered after labor epidural analgesia was available on request (After group).
RESULTS: The frequency of epidural increased from 1% before the availability of on-request epidural analgesia to 83% after epidural analgesia was available on request. A maximal temperature of at least 100.4F was detected in three of 498 (0.6%) women in the Before group, and in 63 of 572 women (11.0%) in the After group (relative risk [RR] = 18.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.8, 57.8, P <.01). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that on-request labor epidural analgesia was associated with an intrapartum temperature of at least 99.5F (RR = 3.0, 95% CI 2.3, 3.6, P <.001) and intrapartum temperature of at least 100.4F (RR = 20.2, 95% CI 7.0, 86.0, P <.001). There were statistically significant increases in the proportion of newborns who had complete blood counts (24% versus 13.5%, RR = 1.5, 95% CI 1.3, 1.8, P <.01) and blood cultures (30.7% versus 8.6%, RR = 1.7, 95% CI 1.2, 2.4, P <.05) in the After period compared with the Before group; however, there was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of infants who received antibiotic therapy for presumed sepsis between the After and Before periods (5.8% versus 4.6%, RR = 1.15, 95% CI 0.8, 1.6, P =.38). No infants in either group had culture-proven sepsis.
CONCLUSION: The use of labor epidural analgesia is associated with a clinically significant increase in the incidence of intrapartum fever.
Full text links
Trending Papers
Bacteremia with gram positive bacteria - when and how do I need to look for endocarditis?Clinical Microbiology and Infection 2023 August 32
Abdominal wall closure.British Journal of Surgery 2023 September 16
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
Read by QxMD is copyright © 2021 QxMD Software Inc. All rights reserved. By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app