We have located links that may give you full text access.
A simple method to estimate the required dialysis time for cases of alcohol poisoning.
Kidney International 2001 November
BACKGROUND: Conventional dialysis management of ethylene glycol and methanol poisoning includes frequent intradialytic determinations of serum toxin concentration. Dialysis is continued until a target toxin concentration is reached. Initially, the required dialysis duration is unknown, making planning difficult. We devised a simple method to estimate the duration of dialysis required and avoid quantitation of multiple toxin samples.
METHODS: Using the assumption that toxic alcohols would have a dialysis clearance similar to urea, we proposed that required dialysis time (hours) to reach a 5 mmol/L toxin concentration target would be: [-V ln(5/A)]/0.06k, where V (liters) is the Watson estimate of total body water, A is the initial toxin concentration (mmol/L), and k is 80% of the manufacturer-specified dialyzer urea clearance (mL/min) at the initial observed blood flow rate. Directly measured dialysis and renal toxin clearance, and true dialysis requirement by conventional treatment protocol were compared with our estimate in two methanol and three ethylene glycol poisonings treated with Fresenius F8 dialyzers.
RESULTS: There were no clinically or statistically significant differences between predicted dialysis duration (7.6 +/- 1.9 hours, +/-SD) and that actually provided using hourly toxin concentration sampling (7.4 +/- 1.9 hours). Renal toxin clearance was negligible compared to that of dialysis, and predicted dialysis clearance did not differ significantly from that observed.
CONCLUSIONS: The simple estimate method is sufficiently valid to guide the prescription of dialysis for toxic alcohol poisoning. Data required at dialysis start include only the initial toxin concentration, dialyzer manufacturer's specified urea clearance at initial observed blood pump speed, and patient demographics to estimate total body water. This approach allows for planned dialysis therapy, without the need for additional toxin concentration measurements until dialysis is completed.
METHODS: Using the assumption that toxic alcohols would have a dialysis clearance similar to urea, we proposed that required dialysis time (hours) to reach a 5 mmol/L toxin concentration target would be: [-V ln(5/A)]/0.06k, where V (liters) is the Watson estimate of total body water, A is the initial toxin concentration (mmol/L), and k is 80% of the manufacturer-specified dialyzer urea clearance (mL/min) at the initial observed blood flow rate. Directly measured dialysis and renal toxin clearance, and true dialysis requirement by conventional treatment protocol were compared with our estimate in two methanol and three ethylene glycol poisonings treated with Fresenius F8 dialyzers.
RESULTS: There were no clinically or statistically significant differences between predicted dialysis duration (7.6 +/- 1.9 hours, +/-SD) and that actually provided using hourly toxin concentration sampling (7.4 +/- 1.9 hours). Renal toxin clearance was negligible compared to that of dialysis, and predicted dialysis clearance did not differ significantly from that observed.
CONCLUSIONS: The simple estimate method is sufficiently valid to guide the prescription of dialysis for toxic alcohol poisoning. Data required at dialysis start include only the initial toxin concentration, dialyzer manufacturer's specified urea clearance at initial observed blood pump speed, and patient demographics to estimate total body water. This approach allows for planned dialysis therapy, without the need for additional toxin concentration measurements until dialysis is completed.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Clinical guideline on reversal of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with life threatening bleeding.European Journal of Anaesthesiology 2024 May 2
Aspiration under anesthesia: what happens after we sound the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist alarm?Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 August 27
Perioperative Management of Patients Taking Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Review.JAMA 2024 August 13
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app