JOURNAL ARTICLE

Effect of the isolated left bundle branch block on systolic and diastolic functions of left ventricle

K Ozdemir, B B Altunkeser, G Daniş, A Ozdemir, Y Uluca, M Tokaç, H H Telli, H Gök
Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 2001, 14 (11): 1075-9
11696831

BACKGROUND: We planned this study to evaluate the effects of left bundle branch block (LBBB) on systolic and diastolic functions of left ventricle (LV) that have not previously been investigated in detail.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-five cases diagnosed as isolated LBBB according to the standard electrocardiographic criteria (group I, mean age: 60 +/- 12 years) were taken as the case group and 65 cases with normal conduction system (group II, mean age 58 +/- 14 years) were taken as the control group. Echocardiography was performed to all patients and coronary angiography was performed to 21 patients in group I and 35 patients in group II. In addition to standard systolic and diastolic function parameters, isovolumetric relaxation time (IRT), isovolumetric contraction time (ICT), and ejection time (ET) were measured by echocardiography, and the myocardial performance index (MPI) [(IRT+ICT)/ET] was calculated. LV end-diastolic pressure was calculated for the patients undergoing coronary angiography.

RESULTS: In group I, LV end-systolic diameter was greater (3.1 +/- 0.4 cm vs 2.8 +/- 0.4 cm, P <.001) and ejection fraction was lower (64% +/- 6% vs 68% +/- 6%, P <.001) than those of group II. Rapid filling deceleration time and rate was markedly different in group I (respectively, 133 +/- 50 ms vs 166 +/- 24 ms, P <.001; 608 +/- 291 cm/s(2) vs 383 +/- 116 cm/s(2), P <.001). In addition, it was found that LBBB caused shortening of LV diastolic period and ET markedly (respectively, 347 +/- 116 ms vs 394 +/- 106 ms, P =.03; 255 +/- 40 ms vs 294 +/- 21 ms, P <.001) and prolongation of IRT and ICT (respectively; 124 +/- 36 ms vs 91 +/- 16 ms, 96 +/- 35 ms vs 38 +/- 9 ms, P <.001). The MPI was predominantly higher in group I (0.89 +/- 0.29 vs 0.40 +/- 0.06, P <.001). Invasively determined LV end-diastolic pressure was found higher in group I (14 +/- 3 mm Hg vs 10 +/- 3 mm Hg, P <.001).

CONCLUSION: A marked elevation of the LV MPI and end-diastolic pressure, parallel to changes of conventional echocardiographic parameters, in patients with isolated LBBB points out that LBBB causes marked deterioration on LV systolic and diastolic functions.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Trending Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
11696831
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"