We have located links that may give you full text access.
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Combined intra-operative monitoring of hearing by means of auditory brainstem responses (ABR) and transtympanic electrocochleography (ECochG) during surgery of intra- and extrameatal acoustic neurinomas.
Acta Neurochirurgica 2001 October
BACKGROUND: Although being established as a standard procedure in intra-operative monitoring in acoustic neurinoma surgery, auditory brainstem responses (ABR) represent a far-field technique bearing some technical limitations. This prospective study was designed to evaluate electrocochleography (ECochG) as a supplementary tool for hearing preservation.
METHOD: 84 patients with unilateral intra-/extrameatal acoustic neurinomas (extrameatal diameter: 5-55 mm) preserving serviceable hearing, were operated on using a combined (neuro-/otosurgical) suboccipital approach. ECochG was recorded simultaneously to ABR following transtympanic insertion of a steel needle electrode into the promontory under otoscopic view.
FINDINGS: Serviceable hearing (Class 1-3 according to Gardner/Robertson) was preserved in 43 out of 84 patients (51.2%), of whom 40 showed both ECochG and ABR being preserved. All 24 patients with loss of both modalities became deaf. Hearing preservation was observed in 4 out of 12 patients with preserved ECochG but loss of ABR (waves III-V). The reverse was observed in 2 cases with postoperative deafness. While both ECochG and ABR amplitudes were significantly correlated with pre- and postoperative hearing, latencies of ECochG summating (SP) and action potential (AP) proved to be more reliable indicators for preserved hearing than ABR (peak I/III/V) latencies. The predictive value of baseline ABR amplitudes for postoperative hearing, however, was superior to ECochG parameters. Only in large neurinomas (extrameatal diameter: >2 cm) tumour size was found to be a significant predictor for the preservation of hearing. Apart from three cases with postoperative otoliquorrhea and one further case presenting with local bleeding within the external acoustic meatus, no side effects were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: In combination with ABR monitoring, ECochG proved to be a useful supplementary tool for hearing preservation in acoustic neurinoma surgery. It is particularly helpful during electrocautery and drilling, since no averaging is required. Special applications are: (1) small tumours with good serviceable hearing; (2) and/or a large intrameatal portion; (3) cases with lost or endangered contralateral hearing (e.g. bilateral acoustic neurinomas), when the preservation of poor or even non-functional hearing is desirable.
METHOD: 84 patients with unilateral intra-/extrameatal acoustic neurinomas (extrameatal diameter: 5-55 mm) preserving serviceable hearing, were operated on using a combined (neuro-/otosurgical) suboccipital approach. ECochG was recorded simultaneously to ABR following transtympanic insertion of a steel needle electrode into the promontory under otoscopic view.
FINDINGS: Serviceable hearing (Class 1-3 according to Gardner/Robertson) was preserved in 43 out of 84 patients (51.2%), of whom 40 showed both ECochG and ABR being preserved. All 24 patients with loss of both modalities became deaf. Hearing preservation was observed in 4 out of 12 patients with preserved ECochG but loss of ABR (waves III-V). The reverse was observed in 2 cases with postoperative deafness. While both ECochG and ABR amplitudes were significantly correlated with pre- and postoperative hearing, latencies of ECochG summating (SP) and action potential (AP) proved to be more reliable indicators for preserved hearing than ABR (peak I/III/V) latencies. The predictive value of baseline ABR amplitudes for postoperative hearing, however, was superior to ECochG parameters. Only in large neurinomas (extrameatal diameter: >2 cm) tumour size was found to be a significant predictor for the preservation of hearing. Apart from three cases with postoperative otoliquorrhea and one further case presenting with local bleeding within the external acoustic meatus, no side effects were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: In combination with ABR monitoring, ECochG proved to be a useful supplementary tool for hearing preservation in acoustic neurinoma surgery. It is particularly helpful during electrocautery and drilling, since no averaging is required. Special applications are: (1) small tumours with good serviceable hearing; (2) and/or a large intrameatal portion; (3) cases with lost or endangered contralateral hearing (e.g. bilateral acoustic neurinomas), when the preservation of poor or even non-functional hearing is desirable.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app