COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Patient care by physician assistants and by physicians in an emergency department

S L Arnopolin, H A Smithline
JAAPA: Official Journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants 2000, 13 (12): 39-40, 49-50, 53-4 passim
11523490

OBJECTIVE: Decreasing health care dollars have resulted in increased utilization of so-called midlevel practitioners. We compared emergency physicians with emergency department physician assistants (PAs) to determine whether PAs are an appropriate option for providing services rendered by physicians in this setting.

METHODS: We undertook an observational retrospective review of a hospital database (July 1995 to June 1996) from an urban urgent-care facility. Collection of data was restricted to times of single-provider coverage. Every patient who visited the clinic was seen by the sole provider (physician or PA) on duty; no one was turned away. If a patient needed emergency care, he (or she) was transferred to the main emergency department at the hospital, as deemed appropriate by either provider after evaluation. Physicians and PAs were compared in regard to length of visit and total charges in 14 diagnostic groups. Adverse outcomes were not evaluated. Age, sex, race, and multiple diagnoses were controlled for by regression analysis.

RESULTS: A total of 9,601 patient encounters were analyzed. PAs and physicians had a similar distribution of diagnostic groups. Respiratory infection and musculoskeletal disorders accounted for approximately 36% of visits; lacerations, gastrointestinal disorders, and otitis each accounted for 5% of visits. Overall, visits were 8 minutes longer and total charges $8 less when a patient was treated by a PA. Patients who had headache, otitis, respiratory infection, asthma, gastrointestinal or genitourinary disorder, cellulitis, laceration, or other musculoskeletal disorder had a longer visit when seen by a PA; the difference ranged from 5 to 32 minutes longer. In no diagnostic group was there a statistically significant greater length of visit or total charge because patients were seen by a PA.

CONCLUSION: Despite a few large differences in some diagnostic groups, the two types of provider had, overall, small but clinically insignificant differences in length of visit and total charges. The magnitude of difference in length of visit and total charges strongly suggests that PAs, when compared with physicians, are a viable staffing option in an urgent care facility.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
11523490
×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"