We have located links that may give you full text access.
Lessons from an unpleasant surprise: a biochemical strategy for the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma.
Journal of Hypertension 2001 June
OBJECTIVE: To audit the performances of the analytes used in the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma and to present a graphical guideline to help the diagnosis.
DESIGN: A 5 year retrospective study.
SETTINGS: Laboratory and departments of a university hospital.
PARTICIPANTS: In-patients, suspected of bearing a pheochromocytoma, were investigated for urinary metanephrines and catecholamines (photometric method) and vanillylmandelic acid, fractionated catecholamines and metanephrines [high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled to electrochemical detection (ED)] urinary excretion.
MAIN OUTCOME: Patients with a pheochromocytoma (24 out of 2003 patients) were diagnosed by the combination of normetanephrine and metanephrine determination.
RESULTS: All analytes but dopamine were significantly elevated in patients with a pheochromocytoma. The area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were the highest for total metanephrines, normetanephrine and metanephrine determinations. Because of analytical interferences in the metanephrines determination, the normetanephrine and metanephrine performed better. It is noteworthy that all pheochromocytomas had either normetanephrine or metanephrine levels above their respective optimal threshold (sensitivity 100%). The best optimal threshold performance was reached by the mean of three daily samples. Total or fractionated catecholamines or vanillylmandelic acid were less accurate tools.
CONCLUSION: Amongst urinary tests, the combined use of HPLC/ED determination of normetanephrine and metanephrine seems the most effective screening strategy for the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma. The older total metanephrine photometric assay is grieved by analytical interferences.
DESIGN: A 5 year retrospective study.
SETTINGS: Laboratory and departments of a university hospital.
PARTICIPANTS: In-patients, suspected of bearing a pheochromocytoma, were investigated for urinary metanephrines and catecholamines (photometric method) and vanillylmandelic acid, fractionated catecholamines and metanephrines [high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled to electrochemical detection (ED)] urinary excretion.
MAIN OUTCOME: Patients with a pheochromocytoma (24 out of 2003 patients) were diagnosed by the combination of normetanephrine and metanephrine determination.
RESULTS: All analytes but dopamine were significantly elevated in patients with a pheochromocytoma. The area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were the highest for total metanephrines, normetanephrine and metanephrine determinations. Because of analytical interferences in the metanephrines determination, the normetanephrine and metanephrine performed better. It is noteworthy that all pheochromocytomas had either normetanephrine or metanephrine levels above their respective optimal threshold (sensitivity 100%). The best optimal threshold performance was reached by the mean of three daily samples. Total or fractionated catecholamines or vanillylmandelic acid were less accurate tools.
CONCLUSION: Amongst urinary tests, the combined use of HPLC/ED determination of normetanephrine and metanephrine seems the most effective screening strategy for the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma. The older total metanephrine photometric assay is grieved by analytical interferences.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app