We have located links that may give you full text access.
Follow-up after attempted curative surgery for colorectal cancer; postal survey of New Zealand surgeons' practice.
New Zealand Medical Journal 2001 April 14
AIMS: The role of follow-up after attempted curative resection of colorectal cancer (CRC) is not clearly defined. We wished to establish the frequency, duration and type of follow-up practised by New Zealand surgeons.
METHODS: A postal survey was performed of surgeons on the General Medical Register, asking about the follow-up of asymptomatic patients after potential curative surgery.
RESULTS: The response rate was 66%(107/163). There was wide variability in the frequency, duration and type of the indicated follow-up practice. 97% of surgeons followed their patients on average four monthly for the first year. At five years, 79% of surgeons followed their patients. Routine blood tests were performed 54%, while serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels were measured by 56% of surgeons for the first two years. 41% performed abdominal imaging in the first two years. 97% of surgeons screened the remaining colon (88% by colonoscopy). 90% performed colonic screening three to five yearly.
CONCLUSIONS: Follow-up after potential curative surgery for CRC appears to be widely practised in New Zealand. There is, however, considerable variation between surgeons in the frequency, duration and type of follow-up. This may reflect the conflicting evidence in the literature on the value of follow-up. The outcome of current large prospective randomised trials may confirm whether or not such follow-up is worthwhile and what form it should take.
METHODS: A postal survey was performed of surgeons on the General Medical Register, asking about the follow-up of asymptomatic patients after potential curative surgery.
RESULTS: The response rate was 66%(107/163). There was wide variability in the frequency, duration and type of the indicated follow-up practice. 97% of surgeons followed their patients on average four monthly for the first year. At five years, 79% of surgeons followed their patients. Routine blood tests were performed 54%, while serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels were measured by 56% of surgeons for the first two years. 41% performed abdominal imaging in the first two years. 97% of surgeons screened the remaining colon (88% by colonoscopy). 90% performed colonic screening three to five yearly.
CONCLUSIONS: Follow-up after potential curative surgery for CRC appears to be widely practised in New Zealand. There is, however, considerable variation between surgeons in the frequency, duration and type of follow-up. This may reflect the conflicting evidence in the literature on the value of follow-up. The outcome of current large prospective randomised trials may confirm whether or not such follow-up is worthwhile and what form it should take.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app