CLINICAL TRIAL
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

[Automatic evaluation of total lung capacity and of emphysema involvement with spiral computerized tomography (CT) in obstructive pneumonia].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate, in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease or chronic bronchitis, inspiratory helical CT with 3D postprocessing, to measure lung volumes and the amount of emphysema and to compare these measurements with lung function tests.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventeen patients with chronic obstructive lung disease disease or chronic bronchitis underwent pulmonary function tests and helical CT after a full inspiration with 3D postprocessing (lower threshold -1024 HU, upper thresholds -200, -300 and -400 HU). Lung inspiratory volumes (TLC-CT) were determined for each model; the amount of emphysema was evaluated by means of an automatic score and a visual score with HRCT.

RESULTS: There is a good correlation between automatic and visual scores (p < 0.001); the automatic score had a good correlation with lung function tests, above all with total lung capacity (r = -0.56; p = 0.01) but the visual score had a much closer correlation with DLCO (r = -0.70; p < 0.001). TLC-CT had a significant correlation with pletismographic TLC (TLC-P); the upper threshold -200 HU was more correct (TLC-P = 8011 cc.; TLC-CT 200 = 7138 cc.; r = 0.83; p < 0.001). The volume change of 3D model was about 230 cc. per 100 HU (p < 0.001) modifying upper thresholds, but no change was observed in the volume occupied by emphysema and the percentage of emphysema presented minimal, clinically non significant modifications.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: In emphysematous patients, the helical CT with 3D model construction is a good technique to evaluate lung volumes and to quantify emphysema with automatic score; this one, however, probably underscores the extent of pathology; therefore, the addition of a visual score with HRCT is probably worthwhile.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app