JOURNAL ARTICLE

Superior vena cava obstruction: is stenting necessary?

P Y Marcy, N Magné, F Bentolila, J Drouillard, J N Bruneton, B Descamps
Supportive Care in Cancer 2001, 9 (2): 103-7
11305067
No therapy is currently available for patients with recurrent vascular obstruction of the superior vena cava (SVC) caused by tumor regrowth after chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Intravascular stenting is a new option for the treatment of vena cava syndrome. Forty cancer patients with SVC syndrome (SVCS) were evaluated by computed tomography (CT) and venography. The SVC or its tributaries were stenosed or thrombosed in all patients. The etiology was malignant in all but 2 cases: non-small-cell lung carcinoma (n = 28), mediastinal nodal metastasis (n = 5), lymphoma (n = 2), pleural mesothelioma (n = 2), small-cell lung carcinoma (n = 1), and postradiation fibrous mediastinitis (n = 2). Stenting was achieved in 39 of the 40 patients, and clinical symptoms subsided in 92%. Stents remained patent in 36 of these 39 patients throughout a mean follow-up of 24 weeks (range 3 days to 24 months). SVC stenting is safe, effective and allows rapid cure of SVCS and port catheter implantation in patients in poor health.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Trending Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
11305067
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"