We have located links that may give you full text access.
Implications of the absence of ST-segment elevation in lead V4R in patients who have inferior wall acute myocardial infarction with right ventricular involvement.
Clinical Cardiology 2001 March
BACKGROUND: ST-segment elevation of > or = 1.0 mm in lead V4R has been shown to be a reliable marker of right ventricular involvement (RVI), a strong predictor of a poor outcome in patients with inferior acute myocardial infarction (IMI). However, patients with no ST-segment elevation in lead V4R despite the presence of RVI have received little attention.
HYPOTHESIS: The study was undertaken to study the clinical features of patients with no ST-segment elevation in lead V4R despite the presence of RVI, which means false negative, as such patients have received little attention in the past.
METHODS: We studied 62 patients with a first IMI, who had total occlusion of the right coronary artery (RCA) proximal to the first right ventricular branch and successful reperfusion within 6 h from symptom onset, to examine the implications of the absence of ST-segment elevation in lead V4R despite the presence of RVI.
RESULTS: A standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) and right precordial ECG (lead V4R) were recorded on admission, and three posterior chest ECGs (leads V7 to V9) were additionally recorded in 34 patients. Patients were classified according to the absence (Group 1, n = 18) or presence (Group 2, n = 44) of ST-segment elevation of > or = 1.0 mm in lead V4R on admission. Patients in Group 1 had a greater ST-segment elevation in leads V7 to V9 (2.9+/-2.4 vs. 1.4+/-3.0 mm. p < 0.05), a higher frequency of a dominant RCA (defined as the distribution score > or = 0.7) (72 vs. 11%, p < 0.001), and a higher peak creatine kinase level (3760+/-1548 vs. 2809+/-1824 mU/ml, p < 0.05) than those in Group 2.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with IMI caused by the occlusion of the RCA proximal to the first right ventricular branch, no ST-segment elevation in lead V4R can occur because of concomitant posterior involvement. In such patients, the incidence of RVI may be underestimated on the basis of ST-segment elevation in lead V4R.
HYPOTHESIS: The study was undertaken to study the clinical features of patients with no ST-segment elevation in lead V4R despite the presence of RVI, which means false negative, as such patients have received little attention in the past.
METHODS: We studied 62 patients with a first IMI, who had total occlusion of the right coronary artery (RCA) proximal to the first right ventricular branch and successful reperfusion within 6 h from symptom onset, to examine the implications of the absence of ST-segment elevation in lead V4R despite the presence of RVI.
RESULTS: A standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) and right precordial ECG (lead V4R) were recorded on admission, and three posterior chest ECGs (leads V7 to V9) were additionally recorded in 34 patients. Patients were classified according to the absence (Group 1, n = 18) or presence (Group 2, n = 44) of ST-segment elevation of > or = 1.0 mm in lead V4R on admission. Patients in Group 1 had a greater ST-segment elevation in leads V7 to V9 (2.9+/-2.4 vs. 1.4+/-3.0 mm. p < 0.05), a higher frequency of a dominant RCA (defined as the distribution score > or = 0.7) (72 vs. 11%, p < 0.001), and a higher peak creatine kinase level (3760+/-1548 vs. 2809+/-1824 mU/ml, p < 0.05) than those in Group 2.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with IMI caused by the occlusion of the RCA proximal to the first right ventricular branch, no ST-segment elevation in lead V4R can occur because of concomitant posterior involvement. In such patients, the incidence of RVI may be underestimated on the basis of ST-segment elevation in lead V4R.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app