We have located links that may give you full text access.
Rosiglitazone prevents the onset of hyperglycaemia and proteinuria in the Zucker diabetic fatty rat.
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism 2000 December
AIM: To investigate the potential of rosiglitazone, a highly potent agonist at the nuclear peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-gamma (PPAR-gamma), to prevent the development of diabetes in the Zucker diabetic fatty (ZDF) rat or to ameliorate the condition at a later stage of the disease.
METHODS: Rosiglitazone (10 micromol/kg body weight daily) was given via the diet to ZDF rats from aged 6 weeks, before the onset of hyperglycaemia (Prevention group), or from aged 21 weeks after hyperglycaemia and proteinuria were established (Intervention group). Untreated ZDF rats and age-matched Zucker lean rats (ZL) served as controls and the experiment was terminated when the animals were aged 28 weeks.
RESULTS: Whilst the combined ZDF control and Intervention groups were already hyperglycaemic (14.6 +/- 1.6 vs. ZL 5.7 +/- 0.1 mmol/l, mean +/- s.e.m.; p < 0.05), glycosuric and polydipsic at aged 11 weeks, and thereafter had a declining plasma insulin concentration, rosiglitazone Prevention treatment maintained normoglycaemia even at aged 27 weeks (3.7 +/- 0.3 mmol/l vs. ZL 3.0 +/- 0.3 mmol/l; NS). Intervention treatment at aged 21 weeks, however, failed to ameliorate the diabetes. These functional data were supported by determinations of pancreatic insulin content (microg/mg tissue as follows: ZL, 43.1 +/- 3.9; ZDF control (28 weeks) + ZDF Intervention control (21 weeks), 6.0 +/- 0.8; Prevention, 63.6 +/- 15.8; Intervention, 6.2 +/- 0.9) and by morphological, immunohistochemical and electron microscopical examination of pancreata at the end of the study. Thus, islets from rosiglitazone Prevention rats were similar to ZL rats, whereas ZDF controls and Intervention rats exhibited islets depleted of insulin, with a disorganized architecture and an ultrastructure indicative of work hypertrophy. ZDF control rats and Intervention rats, though not rosiglitazone Prevention rats, also exhibited marked proteinuria, indicative of renal glomerular damage.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that in ZDF rats, rosiglitazone prevents the progression from insulin resistance to overt diabetes. These data provide a rationale for investigating whether treatment with rosiglitazone of patients with early signs of perturbed glucose metabolism (e.g. impaired fasting glucose (IGT)) may prevent the progression to type 2 diabetes and its associated complications.
METHODS: Rosiglitazone (10 micromol/kg body weight daily) was given via the diet to ZDF rats from aged 6 weeks, before the onset of hyperglycaemia (Prevention group), or from aged 21 weeks after hyperglycaemia and proteinuria were established (Intervention group). Untreated ZDF rats and age-matched Zucker lean rats (ZL) served as controls and the experiment was terminated when the animals were aged 28 weeks.
RESULTS: Whilst the combined ZDF control and Intervention groups were already hyperglycaemic (14.6 +/- 1.6 vs. ZL 5.7 +/- 0.1 mmol/l, mean +/- s.e.m.; p < 0.05), glycosuric and polydipsic at aged 11 weeks, and thereafter had a declining plasma insulin concentration, rosiglitazone Prevention treatment maintained normoglycaemia even at aged 27 weeks (3.7 +/- 0.3 mmol/l vs. ZL 3.0 +/- 0.3 mmol/l; NS). Intervention treatment at aged 21 weeks, however, failed to ameliorate the diabetes. These functional data were supported by determinations of pancreatic insulin content (microg/mg tissue as follows: ZL, 43.1 +/- 3.9; ZDF control (28 weeks) + ZDF Intervention control (21 weeks), 6.0 +/- 0.8; Prevention, 63.6 +/- 15.8; Intervention, 6.2 +/- 0.9) and by morphological, immunohistochemical and electron microscopical examination of pancreata at the end of the study. Thus, islets from rosiglitazone Prevention rats were similar to ZL rats, whereas ZDF controls and Intervention rats exhibited islets depleted of insulin, with a disorganized architecture and an ultrastructure indicative of work hypertrophy. ZDF control rats and Intervention rats, though not rosiglitazone Prevention rats, also exhibited marked proteinuria, indicative of renal glomerular damage.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that in ZDF rats, rosiglitazone prevents the progression from insulin resistance to overt diabetes. These data provide a rationale for investigating whether treatment with rosiglitazone of patients with early signs of perturbed glucose metabolism (e.g. impaired fasting glucose (IGT)) may prevent the progression to type 2 diabetes and its associated complications.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app