JOURNAL ARTICLE
REVIEW
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Neonatal subglottic stenosis--incidence and trends.

Laryngoscope 2001 January
OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: Neonatal subglottic stenosis is a known entity arising from endotracheal tube intubation. In the 1970s and 1980s, estimates of the incidence of subglottic stenosis were in the range of 0.9% to 8.3% of intubated neonates. Because of improved techniques of handling neonates who require ventilatory support, we thought the actual incidence of neonatal subglottic stenosis in the late 1990s was much lower.

STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed all neonatal intensive-care unit (NICU) admissions from 1997 at our institution, which serves as a level 3 NICU. We also performed a MEDLINE search of the reported incidence of neonatal subglottic stenosis between 1960 and 1999.

METHODS: Analysis was performed to identify all children who developed subglottic stenosis at our institution. Data were also collected and analyzed with regard to average gestational age, average birth weight, average duration of intubation, and the number of children requiring tracheostomy. The reports identified in the literature were reviewed as to the incidence of subglottic stenosis.

RESULTS: A total of 544 neonates were admitted to the unit. Of these, 281 were intubated for an average of 11 days. No patients developed subglottic stenosis. Three patients required tracheostomies for other reasons. All studies published after 1983 reported an incidence of neonatal subglottic stenosis as less than 4.0%, and all studies published after 1990 reported an incidence of neonatal subglottic stenosis as less than 0.63%.

CONCLUSIONS: Although our report applies to only a single institution in a single year, after reviewing the literature we think a downward trend exists in the incidence of neonatal subglottic stenosis in the late 1990s. The current incidence of neonatal subglottic stenosis is likely between 0.0% and 2.0%.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app