COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Effects of continuous haemofiltration vs intermittent haemodialysis on systemic haemodynamics and splanchnic regional perfusion in septic shock patients: a prospective, randomized clinical trial

S John, D Griesbach, M Baumgärtel, H Weihprecht, R E Schmieder, H Geiger
Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2001, 16 (2): 320-7
11158407

BACKGROUND: Parameters of splanchnic regional perfusion, like intramucosal pH (pHi) and pCO(2) (pCO(2)i), may predict outcome in septic shock patients. Continuous venovenous haemofiltration (CVVH) has been considered beneficial in haemodynamically unstable septic shock patients. In a prospective, randomized, clinical study, we investigated whether CVVH, in comparison to intermittent haemodialysis (IHD), is able to improve splanchnic regional perfusion in critically ill patients.

METHODS: Thirty septic shock patients with acute renal failure were randomized to either CVVH (n=20) or IHD (n=10) groups for renal replacement therapy. Patient characteristics at baseline were not different in terms of severity of illness (APACHE II scores), haemodynamics, and pHi/pCO(2)i values. Systemic haemodynamics, oxygen transport variables, and splanchnic regional perfusion parameters were measured at 0.5, 2, 4 and 24 h after initiation of renal replacement therapy. There were no major changes in vasopressor support throughout the 24-h study period.

RESULTS: In contrast to IHD, CVVH caused a decrease in heart rate (-3+/-11 vs +9+/-8/min, P<0.01) and an increase in systolic blood pressure (+12+/-1 vs -5+/-17 mmHg, P<0.05) after 2 h. After 24 h, increased systemic vascular resistance was found in the CVVH group in comparison with the IHD group (+312+/-755 vs -29+/-89 dyne/cm(5), P<0.05) and was accompanied by a decrease in cardiac output (-1.54+/-1.4 vs -0.25+/-0.9 l/min, P<0.01). However pHi values remained constant throughout the 24-h study period in both groups and were not different between the groups (CVVH 7.19+/-0.1 vs IHD 7.19+/-0.1, n.s.) as did the pCO(2)i values (CVVH +7+/-17 vs IHD 0+/-15 mmHg, n.s.) and pCO(2) gap values (CVVH +6+/-15 vs IHD +5+/-12 mmHg, n.s.).

CONCLUSIONS: Despite different changes of systemic haemodynamics between CVVH and IHD, CVVH did not improve parameters of splanchnic regional perfusion like pHi, pCO(2)i or pCO(2) gap in septic shock patients.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
11158407
×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"