We have located links that may give you full text access.
Treatment of nonfebrile status epilepticus in Rochester, Minn, from 1965 through 1984.
Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2001 January
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the adequacy and efficacy of antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment of nonfebrile status epilepticus (SE).
PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a population-based retrospective cohort study to evaluate the medical management of SE. Participants included 184 residents of Rochester, Minn, who experienced a first episode of nonfebrile SE between 1965 and 1984.
RESULTS: Of the 184 patients, 133 (72.2%) received appropriate, prompt medical treatment for SE, i.e., intravenous diazepam, phenytoin, or phenobarbital. In 100 patients (75.8%), the dose of the first AED administered was less than that currently recommended. The first treatment was effective in terminating SE in 41 (31.1%) of 132 patients. The adequacy of treatment was highly predictive of drug efficacy (P = .002). The dose of the second AED treatment was inadequate in 52 (80%) of 65 patients treated.
CONCLUSION: Based on this retrospective study, the treatment of SE is remarkable for both inadequacy and ineffectiveness. The inappropriate use of therapeutic regimens in the management of SE may be an important cause of ineffective medical treatment.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a population-based retrospective cohort study to evaluate the medical management of SE. Participants included 184 residents of Rochester, Minn, who experienced a first episode of nonfebrile SE between 1965 and 1984.
RESULTS: Of the 184 patients, 133 (72.2%) received appropriate, prompt medical treatment for SE, i.e., intravenous diazepam, phenytoin, or phenobarbital. In 100 patients (75.8%), the dose of the first AED administered was less than that currently recommended. The first treatment was effective in terminating SE in 41 (31.1%) of 132 patients. The adequacy of treatment was highly predictive of drug efficacy (P = .002). The dose of the second AED treatment was inadequate in 52 (80%) of 65 patients treated.
CONCLUSION: Based on this retrospective study, the treatment of SE is remarkable for both inadequacy and ineffectiveness. The inappropriate use of therapeutic regimens in the management of SE may be an important cause of ineffective medical treatment.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app