Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Adult-size kidneys without acute tubular necrosis provide exceedingly superior long-term graft outcomes for infants and small children: a single center and UNOS analysis. United Network for Organ Sharing.

Transplantation 2000 December 28
BACKGROUND: Infants with end-stage renal disease are at highest risk for early graft loss and mortality of any subgroup undergoing renal transplantation. This study evaluates the influence of donor tissue mass and acute tubular necrosis (ATN) on graft survival and incidence of acute rejection episodes in infant and small child recipients of living donor (LD) and cadaver (CAD) adult-size kidneys (ASKs), pediatric CAD kidneys and combined kidney-liver transplants. Methods. Kidney transplants in infants and small children at a single center and those reported to the UNOS Scientific Renal Transplant Registry were analyzed. At Stanford, multi-variate analysis was conducted on 45 consecutive renal allograft recipients weighing < or = 15 kg, mean weight 11.2 +/- 2.6 kg. The UNOS Registry results in age groups 0-2.5 (n=548) and 2.5-5 years (n=743) were compared with age groups 6-12, 13-18, and the lowest risk adult group of 19-45 years. STANFORD RESULTS. Graft survival was 97.8 +/- 0.0 at 2 years and 84.6 +/- 0.1% at 8 years. The incidence of biopsy proven rejection was 8.8% in the first 3 months and 15.5% over the 8-year follow-up. None of the pediatric CAD kidneys had ATN. Rejection episodes were restricted to the pediatric CAD kidneys alone (3/3), with no kidney rejections in the combined pediatric CAD kidney-liver transplants (0/6; P=0.003). Four ASK transplants had ATN (1 postoperative and 3 late), and all predisposed to subsequent acute rejection episodes (4/4), whereas there were no rejection episodes in ASK transplants without ATN (0/32; P<0.001). At 3 years posttransplantation, mean serum creatinines were worse in ASKs with ATN (1.5 vs. 0.9 mg/dL; P<0.001) and in all grafts with rejection episodes (1.2 vs. 0.9 mg/dL; P<0.05). UNOS RESULTS: Among the 5 age groups studied, significantly better (P<0.001) long-term graft survival rates were observed in allograft recipients in the 2 youngest age groups with ASKs without ATN: 82 +/- 3% and 81 +/- 3% for LD and 70 +/- 7% and 78 +/- 4% for CAD recipients in the 0-2.5 and 2.5- to 5-year age groups, respectively, at 6 years after transplantation. Moreover, the projected graft half-lives after the 1st year in the LD groups without ATN were at least equivalent to those of HLA-identical sibling recipients ages 19-45 years: 26.3 +/- 5 and 29.3 +/- 6 years for the 0- to 2.5- and 2.5- to 5-year age groups, respectively, and 23.3 +/- 1 years for HLA-identical transplants. The graft half-lives for CAD recipients without ATN ages 0-2.5 and 2.5-5 yearswere equivalent or better than those for LD transplants without ATN in recipients aged 19-45 years: 15.4+/- 7 and 23.7 +/- 8 years versus 15.0 +/- 0.3 years. Mean serum creatinines were superior in the 2 younger recipient age groups compared with older age groups.

CONCLUSIONS: Increased donor tissue mass of the ASK or kidney-liver transplants, in the absence of ATN, seems to confer a protective effect to infant and small child recipients of these allografts. This is manifested by a prolonged rejection-free state in the single center experience and enhanced graft survival and function in the UNOS analysis, comparable to HLA identical sibling transplants for LD infant and small child recipients and to LD adult results for CAD infant and small child recipients. To optimize this protective effect by whatever mechanism, absolute avoidance of ATN is essential in infant recipients of ASK or combined kidney-liver transplants.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app