We have located links that may give you full text access.
Hemodialysis arteriovenous access: detection of stenosis and response to treatment by vascular access blood flow.
Kidney International 2001 January
BACKGROUND: Hemodialysis access to the circulation is best provided by native and synthetic arteriovenous fistulae (AVF and AVG). Thromboses caused by venous outflow stenoses prevent the long-term use of AV access. This pilot study was performed to evaluate the ability of ultrasound dilution-derived access blood flows to detect AV access stenosis and to evaluate the response to treatment.
METHODS: This pilot study was a single-center, prospective observational intervention trial. The monitoring technique used was ultrasound dilution access blood flow measurements performed monthly and after any intervention. Screening criteria for interventions were decrements in access flow of 20% when the flow value fell under 1000 mL/min or absolute flow of <600 mL/min. The primary intervention when flow criteria were met was biplanar venography of the access with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of detected stenoses. Stenoses unresponsive to PTA were sent for surgical revision. Access thrombosis was considered a study ending event.
RESULTS: Baseline access flow at study entry for AVF was 919 and 1237 mL/min for AVG. Sequential measurement of AV access flow detected AV access stenosis. PTA and surgical revision significantly restored AV access flow back toward the baseline flow measurement. Failure to restore access flow by at least 20% following intervention occurred in 14% of AVF and 21% of AVG PTA attempts. Transluminal angioplasty, once successfully performed, was required at a mean of 5.8-month intervals in order to maintain AVG flow. In contrast, AVF flow was restored for a much longer period of time following angioplasty (11.4 month follow-up at the time of study end). Compared with historic controls, which used venous dialysis pressure as the primary monitoring technique, the overall (AVF-AVG) thrombosis rates improved from 25 to 16% per patient year, and AVF thrombosis rates improved from 16 to 7% per patient year. When flow was not successfully restored, thrombosis ensued. Eight of 10 thrombosis episodes were predicted based on inability to improve access flow either as a result of stenosis treatment failure or unsuccessful referral for treatment.
CONCLUSION: Sequential measurement of AV access flow is an acceptable means of both monitoring for the development of access stenoses and assessing response to therapy. PTAs of AVF are more durable than PTAs of AV grafts.
METHODS: This pilot study was a single-center, prospective observational intervention trial. The monitoring technique used was ultrasound dilution access blood flow measurements performed monthly and after any intervention. Screening criteria for interventions were decrements in access flow of 20% when the flow value fell under 1000 mL/min or absolute flow of <600 mL/min. The primary intervention when flow criteria were met was biplanar venography of the access with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of detected stenoses. Stenoses unresponsive to PTA were sent for surgical revision. Access thrombosis was considered a study ending event.
RESULTS: Baseline access flow at study entry for AVF was 919 and 1237 mL/min for AVG. Sequential measurement of AV access flow detected AV access stenosis. PTA and surgical revision significantly restored AV access flow back toward the baseline flow measurement. Failure to restore access flow by at least 20% following intervention occurred in 14% of AVF and 21% of AVG PTA attempts. Transluminal angioplasty, once successfully performed, was required at a mean of 5.8-month intervals in order to maintain AVG flow. In contrast, AVF flow was restored for a much longer period of time following angioplasty (11.4 month follow-up at the time of study end). Compared with historic controls, which used venous dialysis pressure as the primary monitoring technique, the overall (AVF-AVG) thrombosis rates improved from 25 to 16% per patient year, and AVF thrombosis rates improved from 16 to 7% per patient year. When flow was not successfully restored, thrombosis ensued. Eight of 10 thrombosis episodes were predicted based on inability to improve access flow either as a result of stenosis treatment failure or unsuccessful referral for treatment.
CONCLUSION: Sequential measurement of AV access flow is an acceptable means of both monitoring for the development of access stenoses and assessing response to therapy. PTAs of AVF are more durable than PTAs of AV grafts.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app