We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Optimal conduit size for extracardiac Fontan operation.
European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery 2000 December
BACKGROUND: Lack of conduit growth potential and thrombogenicity are the main drawbacks of the extracardiac Fontan operation (ECFO). Optimal size of the conduit according to the patients age and inferior vena cava diameter has not been established.
OBJECTIVES: We set out to ascertain whether the optimal dimensions of the conduit could be determined before an ECFO.
METHODS: Actual and expected age-related inferior vena cava diameters were compared with the extracardiac conduit diameter in 20 patients after ECFO. In 50 other pediatric and adult patients, the distance between intrapericardial part of the inferior vena cava and the undersurface of the right pulmonary artery (IVC-RPA) was measured. Cases of conduit thrombosis were analyzed.
RESULTS: The actual diameter of the inferior vena cava was variable and has a weak correlation with anthropometric data and expected diameter (R=0.07-0.23, P=0.32-0.76). The IVC-RPA distance correlated with height (R=0.87, P=0.0001), but was also variable. At the age of 2-4 years and body weight 12-15 kg IVC diameter and IVC-RPA distance are equal to 60-80% of adult values. Conduit thrombosis developed in two patients with unfavorable Fontan hemodynamics and oversized conduits.
CONCLUSIONS: Considering the inferior vena cava size, ECFO may be performed at the age of 2-3 years and at a body weight 12-15 kg, when a hemodynamically optimal almost adult sized conduit can be implanted. Optimization of the conduit is necessary on the basis of the actual inferior vena cava diameter and IVC-RPA distance. Anticoagulation postoperatively should be considered to prevent conduit thrombosis in patients with suboptimal Fontan circulation
OBJECTIVES: We set out to ascertain whether the optimal dimensions of the conduit could be determined before an ECFO.
METHODS: Actual and expected age-related inferior vena cava diameters were compared with the extracardiac conduit diameter in 20 patients after ECFO. In 50 other pediatric and adult patients, the distance between intrapericardial part of the inferior vena cava and the undersurface of the right pulmonary artery (IVC-RPA) was measured. Cases of conduit thrombosis were analyzed.
RESULTS: The actual diameter of the inferior vena cava was variable and has a weak correlation with anthropometric data and expected diameter (R=0.07-0.23, P=0.32-0.76). The IVC-RPA distance correlated with height (R=0.87, P=0.0001), but was also variable. At the age of 2-4 years and body weight 12-15 kg IVC diameter and IVC-RPA distance are equal to 60-80% of adult values. Conduit thrombosis developed in two patients with unfavorable Fontan hemodynamics and oversized conduits.
CONCLUSIONS: Considering the inferior vena cava size, ECFO may be performed at the age of 2-3 years and at a body weight 12-15 kg, when a hemodynamically optimal almost adult sized conduit can be implanted. Optimization of the conduit is necessary on the basis of the actual inferior vena cava diameter and IVC-RPA distance. Anticoagulation postoperatively should be considered to prevent conduit thrombosis in patients with suboptimal Fontan circulation
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app