CLINICAL TRIAL
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

The predictability of corneal flap thickness and tissue laser ablation in laser in situ keratomileusis.

Ophthalmology 2000 December
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between predicted flap thickness and actual flap thickness and between predicted tissue ablation and actual tissue ablation.

DESIGN: Prospective, nonrandomized comparative (self-controlled) trial.

PARTICIPANTS: A total of 60 patients (102 eyes) who underwent laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Subtraction pachymetry was used to determine actual corneal flap thickness and corneal tissue ablation depth. Other measurements included flap diameter and keratometry readings.

RESULTS: Actual flap thickness was significantly different (P < 0.0001) from predicted flap thickness. Fifteen eyes had a predicted flap thickness of 160 micrometer and a mean actual flap of 105 micrometer (standard deviation [SD], +/-24. 3 micrometer range, 48-141 micrometer). Sixty-four had a predicted flap of 180 micrometer with an actual flap mean of 125 micrometer (SD, +/-18.5 micrometer range, 82-155 micrometer). Seventeen eyes had a predicted flap of 200 micrometer, with an actual flap mean of 144 micrometer (SD, +/-19.3 micrometer range, 108-187 micrometer). In addition, we found that significantly more tissue (P < 0.0001) was ablated than predicted. Linear regression of the observed ablation on predicted ablation yielded the following relationship: actual ablation = 14.5 + 1.5 (predicted ablation). Neither flap diameter nor flap thickness were found to increase with respect to steeper corneal curvatures.

CONCLUSIONS: Actual corneal flap thickness was consistently less than predicted regardless of the depth plate used; actual tissue ablation was consistently greater than predicted tissue ablation for the laser used in this study.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app