We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Airway hyperreactivity in subjects with tetraplegia is associated with reduced baseline airway caliber.
Chest 2000 November
OBJECTIVES: We administered aerosolized histamine to 32 subjects with tetraplegia to determine whether there were differences in spirometric and/or lung volume parameters between responders and nonresponders.
RESULTS: Baseline pulmonary function parameters revealed mild to moderate restrictive dysfunction. We found that 25 subjects (78%) were hyperreactive to histamine (mean provocative concentration of a substance causing a 20% fall in FEV(1) [PC(20)], 1.77 mg/mL). Responders (PC(20), < 8 mg/mL) had significantly lower values for forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of the outflow curve (FEF(25-75)), FEF(25-75) percent predicted, and FEF(25-75)/FVC ratio. Among all 32 subjects, the natural logarithmic transformation performed on PC(20) values (lnPC(20)) correlated with FEF(25-75) percent predicted, FEV(1) percent predicted, and FEF(25-75)/FVC ratio but not with FVC percent predicted. Responders with PC(20) values < 2 mg/mL (n = 13) had significantly reduced values for FVC, FVC percent predicted, FEV(1), and FEV(1) percent predicted compared to those with PC(20) values between 2 mg/mL and 8 mg/mL. In addition, among responders, there was a significant correlation between lnPC(20) and FVC percent predicted. A significant relationship was found between maximal inspiratory pressure (PImax) and both FEV(1) percent predicted and FEF(25-75) percent predicted, but not between lnPC(20) and either PImax or maximal expiratory pressure (PEmax).
CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that subjects with tetraplegia who exhibit airway hyperreactivity (AHR) have reduced baseline airway caliber and that lower values for lnPC(20) are associated with parallel reductions in surrogate spirometric indexes of airway size (FEV(1) percent predicted and FEF(25-75) percent predicted) and airway size relative to lung size (FEF(25-75)/FVC ratio). The absence of an association between lnPC(20) and FVC percent predicted for the entire group or between lnPC(20) and either PImax or PEmax indicates that reduced lung volumes secondary to respiratory muscle weakness cannot explain the mechanism(s) underlying AHR. Among responders, however, a possible role for reduction in lung volume, as it pertains to increasing AHR, cannot be excluded. Proposed mechanisms for reduced baseline airway caliber relative to lung size in subjects with tetraplegia include unopposed parasympathetic activity secondary to the loss of sympathetic innervation to the lungs and/or the inability to stretch airway smooth muscle with deep inhalation.
RESULTS: Baseline pulmonary function parameters revealed mild to moderate restrictive dysfunction. We found that 25 subjects (78%) were hyperreactive to histamine (mean provocative concentration of a substance causing a 20% fall in FEV(1) [PC(20)], 1.77 mg/mL). Responders (PC(20), < 8 mg/mL) had significantly lower values for forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of the outflow curve (FEF(25-75)), FEF(25-75) percent predicted, and FEF(25-75)/FVC ratio. Among all 32 subjects, the natural logarithmic transformation performed on PC(20) values (lnPC(20)) correlated with FEF(25-75) percent predicted, FEV(1) percent predicted, and FEF(25-75)/FVC ratio but not with FVC percent predicted. Responders with PC(20) values < 2 mg/mL (n = 13) had significantly reduced values for FVC, FVC percent predicted, FEV(1), and FEV(1) percent predicted compared to those with PC(20) values between 2 mg/mL and 8 mg/mL. In addition, among responders, there was a significant correlation between lnPC(20) and FVC percent predicted. A significant relationship was found between maximal inspiratory pressure (PImax) and both FEV(1) percent predicted and FEF(25-75) percent predicted, but not between lnPC(20) and either PImax or maximal expiratory pressure (PEmax).
CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that subjects with tetraplegia who exhibit airway hyperreactivity (AHR) have reduced baseline airway caliber and that lower values for lnPC(20) are associated with parallel reductions in surrogate spirometric indexes of airway size (FEV(1) percent predicted and FEF(25-75) percent predicted) and airway size relative to lung size (FEF(25-75)/FVC ratio). The absence of an association between lnPC(20) and FVC percent predicted for the entire group or between lnPC(20) and either PImax or PEmax indicates that reduced lung volumes secondary to respiratory muscle weakness cannot explain the mechanism(s) underlying AHR. Among responders, however, a possible role for reduction in lung volume, as it pertains to increasing AHR, cannot be excluded. Proposed mechanisms for reduced baseline airway caliber relative to lung size in subjects with tetraplegia include unopposed parasympathetic activity secondary to the loss of sympathetic innervation to the lungs and/or the inability to stretch airway smooth muscle with deep inhalation.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app