We have located links that may give you full text access.
English Abstract
Journal Article
[Predictive factors of successful treatment of lower caliceal calculi with Edap LT02 extracorporeal lithotripsy].
Progrès en Urologie 2000 September
OBJECTIVE: To determine the predictive factors of success of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for lower caliceal stones.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: The case files of 100 patients with a single stone in the lower pole of the kidney, ranging in size from 6 to 25 mm, treated by EDAP LTO2 extracorporeal lithotripsy between 1994 and 1997, were studied. Pretreatment intravenous urography was reviewed to assess the characteristics of the stone, to measure the pyelocaliceal angle and to study the anatomy of the lower pole of the kidney.
RESULTS: The overall stone-free rate at 3 months was 57%. The success rate was 67.18% for stones smaller than 1 cm and 38.88% for stones larger than 1 cm. Stones denser than bone were successfully treated in 45.5% of cases, those less dense than bone were successfully treated in 71.11% of cases. The success rate was 86.04% when the pyelocaliceal angle was greater than 90 degrees and 35.08% when this angle was less than 90 degrees. The stone-free rate was 75% when the caliceal stalk was less than 3 cm and 37.5% when the stalk was greater than 3 cm.
CONCLUSION: In this series, the size of the stone, its density, the pyelocaliceal angle and the length of the caliceal stalk were predictive elements of the success of ESWL for lower caliceal stones. The pyelocaliceal angle was the most significant factor. A very dense stone on the plain abdominal film with a diameter of 1 cm or more and presenting unfavourable anatomical factors should be treated by percutaneous nephrolithotomy as the first-line procedure.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: The case files of 100 patients with a single stone in the lower pole of the kidney, ranging in size from 6 to 25 mm, treated by EDAP LTO2 extracorporeal lithotripsy between 1994 and 1997, were studied. Pretreatment intravenous urography was reviewed to assess the characteristics of the stone, to measure the pyelocaliceal angle and to study the anatomy of the lower pole of the kidney.
RESULTS: The overall stone-free rate at 3 months was 57%. The success rate was 67.18% for stones smaller than 1 cm and 38.88% for stones larger than 1 cm. Stones denser than bone were successfully treated in 45.5% of cases, those less dense than bone were successfully treated in 71.11% of cases. The success rate was 86.04% when the pyelocaliceal angle was greater than 90 degrees and 35.08% when this angle was less than 90 degrees. The stone-free rate was 75% when the caliceal stalk was less than 3 cm and 37.5% when the stalk was greater than 3 cm.
CONCLUSION: In this series, the size of the stone, its density, the pyelocaliceal angle and the length of the caliceal stalk were predictive elements of the success of ESWL for lower caliceal stones. The pyelocaliceal angle was the most significant factor. A very dense stone on the plain abdominal film with a diameter of 1 cm or more and presenting unfavourable anatomical factors should be treated by percutaneous nephrolithotomy as the first-line procedure.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app