JOURNAL ARTICLE

Inoue balloon mitral valvuloplasty: long-term clinical and echocardiographic follow-up of a predominantly unfavourable population

D J Hildick-Smith, G J Taylor, L M Shapiro
European Heart Journal 2000, 21 (20): 1690-7
11032696

AIMS: To assess long-term outcome in a typical Western population of predominantly unfavourable patients undergoing Inoue balloon mitral valvuloplasty. Outcome amongst patients has only been undertaken in the medium term. Long-term echocardiographic data in particular are scarce.

METHODS: Inoue mitral valvuloplasty was attempted in 106 patients. There were six technical failures; the procedure was therefore completed in 100 patients, who underwent annual clinical and echocardiographic follow-up.

RESULTS: Patients were aged 63.5+/-10. 3 years. 82% were female. Unfavourable characteristics included age >65 (52%), NYHA class III or IV (87%), >/=1 significant co-morbidity (63%), atrial fibrillation (82%), previous surgical commissurotomy (25%) and echocardiographic score >8 (59%, mean 8.9+/-2.1). Mitral valve area increased from 0.98+/-0.23 to 1.54+/-0.31 cm(2). There were three major complications. Post-procedure, symptoms improved in 88% of patients. Haemodynamic success (mitral valve area increase >50%, final mitral valve area >1.5 cm(2), mitral regurgitation </=grade 2) was achieved in 61% of cases. Mean follow-up was 4.3+/-1. 4 years. Survival was 97%, 88% and 82% at 1, 3 and 6 years. Event-free survival (freedom from death, mitral valve replacement or repeat valvuloplasty) was 96%, 82% and 56% at 1, 3 and 6 years. Freedom from restenosis (loss of >50% gain in mitral valve area, mitral valve area <1.5cm (2)) was 98%, 92% and 75% at 1, 3 and 6 years. Pre-procedural predictors of event-free survival were male sex, absence of co-morbidities, lower echocardiographic score and smaller left atrial diameter.

CONCLUSIONS: In a Western population with predominantly unfavourable characteristics for mitral valvuloplasty, long-term outcome post-procedure is reasonable. A moderate increase in mitral valve area can be achieved at low procedural risk, and the subsequent rate of restenosis is low. Nonetheless, 6 years after the procedure, half of the patients will have required further intervention or died. For fitter patients willing to accept significant operative risk, mitral valve replacement remains a valuable alternative.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Trending Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
11032696
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"

We want to hear from doctors like you!

Take a second to answer a survey question.