CLINICAL TRIAL
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Can clinical parameters predict fractures in acute pediatric wrist injuries?

OBJECTIVE: Fractures around the wrist are common in pediatric patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). This pilot study was aimed at identifying clinical variables that are most likely to be associated with a fracture.

METHODS: This was a prospective blinded case series of patients 3-18 years of age presenting with an acute (<3 days) wrist injury, without obvious deformity. A team of five investigators blinded to the eventual radiographic findings evaluated patients. Physical examination variables included range of motion (ROM), site of maximal tenderness, and functional deficit. The latter was determined objectively, by recording any difference in grip strength between the injured and noninjured hands. Diagnostic radiographs were obtained for all patients. Univariate analysis using Wilks' log likelihood ratio test was performed to identify clinical variables associated with confirmed wrist fractures. Sample size was determined based on the ability to detect a difference of 15 degrees in the ROM variables, 20% point differences in grip strength, and 30% proportion differences in categorical variables using a power of 0.8 and a two-tailed of 0.05.

RESULTS: The ROMs were not significantly different between the fracture (Fx) and nonfracture (NFx) group. There was significant change in the grip strength between the Fx and NFx groups (t = 3.3, p = 0.0019). Tenderness over the distal radius was also associated with a greater likelihood of a fracture (G(2) = 5.0, p = 0.02). Sensitivity of clinical prediction was found to be 79%, and specificity was 63%. The false-negative rate was 0.21 and the false-positive rate was 0.37, while the positive predictive value was found to be 0.68 and negative predictive value 0.75.

CONCLUSIONS: Distal radius point tenderness and a 20% or more decrease in grip strength were predictive of fractures.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app