We have located links that may give you full text access.
[Psychosocial distress and its moderating factors in patients living in precarious socioeconomic conditions consulting in a preventive health and social work center].
Revue D'épidémiologie et de Santé Publique 2000 August
BACKGROUND: The effects of a precarious socioeconomic condition on mental health have already been widely described. Nevertheless, sociodemographic, biographical, and mainly psychological determinants of psychosocial distress in these populations are still incompletely known.
METHODS: 2315 consecutive subjects, aged 16 to 59, consulting for a free work-up in a preventive health center supported by the National French Health Insurance system, were invited to fill out a series of questionnaires, mainly the GHQ-28 (psychosocial distress), the LOT (dispositional optimism) and the WCCL (coping mechanisms). Socioeconomic and administrative criteria were adopted to define populations living in precarious conditions.
RESULTS: A total of 78.9% complete records could be analyzed: 55% of the studied population constituted the precarious condition group (44.5% males and 55.5% females; mean age 36.2+/-11). This group was characterized by higher psychosocial distress and higher sub-scores of anxiety, social dysfunction and depression, but not somatisation, as well as by increased emotion focused coping and impaired optimism. Globally, GHQ score was positively correlated with emotion focused coping (r=0.36) and negatively with problem focused coping (r=-0.17) and with optimism (r=-0.39). In a multivariate analysis a set of 9 independent variables explained 38% of GHQ-28 total variance: perceived stress, optimism, emotion focused coping, problem focused coping, age, educational degree, precariousness, money problems and parental quarrels during youth. Introducing precariousness in the model constituted of the set of the remaining variables could explain only 2% of additional variance.
CONCLUSION: These results confirm the presence of higher levels of psychosocial distress in subjects living in precarious conditions and underline the moderating role of several psychological variables. They could guide support interventions aimed at helping subjects living in precarious conditions, focused on enhancing their coping resources.
METHODS: 2315 consecutive subjects, aged 16 to 59, consulting for a free work-up in a preventive health center supported by the National French Health Insurance system, were invited to fill out a series of questionnaires, mainly the GHQ-28 (psychosocial distress), the LOT (dispositional optimism) and the WCCL (coping mechanisms). Socioeconomic and administrative criteria were adopted to define populations living in precarious conditions.
RESULTS: A total of 78.9% complete records could be analyzed: 55% of the studied population constituted the precarious condition group (44.5% males and 55.5% females; mean age 36.2+/-11). This group was characterized by higher psychosocial distress and higher sub-scores of anxiety, social dysfunction and depression, but not somatisation, as well as by increased emotion focused coping and impaired optimism. Globally, GHQ score was positively correlated with emotion focused coping (r=0.36) and negatively with problem focused coping (r=-0.17) and with optimism (r=-0.39). In a multivariate analysis a set of 9 independent variables explained 38% of GHQ-28 total variance: perceived stress, optimism, emotion focused coping, problem focused coping, age, educational degree, precariousness, money problems and parental quarrels during youth. Introducing precariousness in the model constituted of the set of the remaining variables could explain only 2% of additional variance.
CONCLUSION: These results confirm the presence of higher levels of psychosocial distress in subjects living in precarious conditions and underline the moderating role of several psychological variables. They could guide support interventions aimed at helping subjects living in precarious conditions, focused on enhancing their coping resources.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app