COMPARATIVE STUDY
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

[Peak expiratory flow rate in 4- to 15-year-old children. Comparison of 3 measuring models].

OBJECTIVE: a) To establish the possible differences between three different models of PEF-meter, including PF-Control for the first time; b) to build a normogram for each of the three models, as a function of different variables (age, height, and inspiratory and espiratory thoracic circumference); c) to search for differences between both sexes, and d) to study the mathematical correlation between the results yielded by the different models.

METHODS: PEF was measured in a sample of 476 school-children, in the range of 4 and 15 years (233 boys, 243 girls), with a mean age of 9,3 years and a height range between 96,8 cm and 178,8 cm (mean 137,9). PEF value was recorded as the best of three attempts when the difference them was less than 10%. Three devices of each model were used (Vitalograph, Mini-Wright, PF-Control). The utilisation was always done in a rotatory fashion at school time (15-17 hours) in the children's school.

RESULTS: We found significant differences between the three models (p < 0,0004). The best predictive variable for PEF is height, with an r = 0,90-0,92 (depending on the model) when the exponential model is considered. Independently of the device, there were significant differences between sexes.

CONCLUSIONS: a) The variable that expresses PEF the better is height; b) PEF values are different between girls and boys; c) there were significant differences between the various models; d) Monitoring of a given child must be done with the same model of PEF-meter, and e) The best correlation is obtained with the exponential model, although differences with the lineal model were not statistically significant.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app