CLINICAL TRIAL
JOURNAL ARTICLE
MULTICENTER STUDY
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Management of spasticity associated pain with botulinum toxin A.

Lesions of the central nervous system often result in an upper motor neuron syndrome including spasticity, paresis with pyramidal signs, and painful spasms. Pharmacological treatment with oral antispasticity drugs is frequently associated with systemic side effects which limit their clinical use. Botulinum Toxin A (BtxA) injected in spastic muscles has been shown to be effective in reducing muscle tone, but only few studies have reported pain relief as additional benefit. Therefore, we investigated the effects of local BtxA injections in 60 patients with acute (< 12 months) and chronic spasticity and pain in a prospective multicenter study. Target muscles for BtxA were selected on the basis of clinical examination. Intramuscular BtxA injections were placed in muscles exhibiting increased muscle tone in combination with pain during passive joint movement. Patients received a mean total dose of 165.7 +/- 108.2 [30-400] units BOTOX((R)) per treatment session in a mean 3.4 +/- 1.5 muscles. Baseline and follow-up (mean 5.9 weeks) measures included a patient self-assessment of pain and function on a five-level scale, a physician's evaluation of function, and a global rating of response to BtxA. Fifty-four of sixty patients experienced improvement in pain without subjective functional improvement. The effects were comparable in acute (n = 17) and chronic (n = 43) spasticity. Physician's assessment of gain in function increased significantly (p < 0.05) only in patients with chronic spasticity. No serious adverse event was observed. Mild reversible side effects (local pain, hematoma, edema, mild weakness) were observed in four patients. In conclusion, we found that intramuscular BtxA injections are a potent, well-tolerated treatment modality to significantly reduce spasticity-related local pain. This problem may be a main indication, especially in patients with poor response or intolerable side effects to oral medication.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Group 7SearchHeart failure treatmentPapersTopicsCollectionsEffects of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors for the Treatment of Patients With Heart Failure Importance: Only 1 class of glucose-lowering agents-sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors-has been reported to decrease the risk of cardiovascular events primarily by reducingSeptember 1, 2017: JAMA CardiologyAssociations of albuminuria in patients with chronic heart failure: findings in the ALiskiren Observation of heart Failure Treatment study.CONCLUSIONS: Increased UACR is common in patients with heart failure, including non-diabetics. Urinary albumin creatininineJul, 2011: European Journal of Heart FailureRandomized Controlled TrialEffects of Liraglutide on Clinical Stability Among Patients With Advanced Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Review

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Read by QxMD is copyright © 2021 QxMD Software Inc. All rights reserved. By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app